From 4106eb9bdae662e6ba14f1b55a33c8a2489ff86b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 15:41:41 +0100 Subject: btrfs: make btrfs_should_delete_dir_index() return a bool instead There's no need to return errors and we currently return 1 in case the index should be deleted and 0 otherwise, so change the return type from int to bool as this is a boolean function and it's more clear this way. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index 1e9bec6d24f7..050723ade942 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c @@ -1734,17 +1734,16 @@ void btrfs_readdir_put_delayed_items(struct btrfs_inode *inode, downgrade_write(&inode->vfs_inode.i_rwsem); } -int btrfs_should_delete_dir_index(const struct list_head *del_list, - u64 index) +bool btrfs_should_delete_dir_index(const struct list_head *del_list, u64 index) { struct btrfs_delayed_item *curr; - int ret = 0; + bool ret = false; list_for_each_entry(curr, del_list, readdir_list) { if (curr->index > index) break; if (curr->index == index) { - ret = 1; + ret = true; break; } } -- cgit v1.2.3