From f3dc24c52a28c700e35757dce7b38456888071e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Sterba Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 16:51:53 +0200 Subject: btrfs: switch extent_buffer spinning_writers from atomic to int The spinning_writers is either 0 or 1 and always updated under the lock, so we don't need the atomic_t semantics. Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/locking.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/locking.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c index 5feb01147e19..270667627977 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c @@ -15,19 +15,19 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG static void btrfs_assert_spinning_writers_get(struct extent_buffer *eb) { - WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers)); - atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers); + WARN_ON(eb->spinning_writers); + eb->spinning_writers++; } static void btrfs_assert_spinning_writers_put(struct extent_buffer *eb) { - WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers) != 1); - atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_writers); + WARN_ON(eb->spinning_writers != 1); + eb->spinning_writers--; } static void btrfs_assert_no_spinning_writers(struct extent_buffer *eb) { - WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers)); + WARN_ON(eb->spinning_writers); } static void btrfs_assert_spinning_readers_get(struct extent_buffer *eb) -- cgit v1.2.3