From 9e1f1de02c2275d7172e18dc4e7c2065777611bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:24:58 -0400 Subject: more conservative S_NOSEC handling Caching "we have already removed suid/caps" was overenthusiastic as merged. On network filesystems we might have had suid/caps set on another client, silently picked by this client on revalidate, all of that *without* clearing the S_NOSEC flag. AFAICS, the only reasonably sane way to deal with that is * new superblock flag; unless set, S_NOSEC is not going to be set. * local block filesystems set it in their ->mount() (more accurately, mount_bdev() does, so does btrfs ->mount(), users of mount_bdev() other than local block ones clear it) * if any network filesystem (or a cluster one) wants to use S_NOSEC, it'll need to set MS_NOSEC in sb->s_flags *AND* take care to clear S_NOSEC when inode attribute changes are picked from other clients. It's not an earth-shattering hole (anybody that can set suid on another client will almost certainly be able to write to the file before doing that anyway), but it's a bug that needs fixing. Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/fuse/inode.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'fs/fuse') diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c index cc6ec4b2f0ff..38f84cd48b67 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c @@ -921,6 +921,8 @@ static int fuse_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) if (sb->s_flags & MS_MANDLOCK) goto err; + sb->s_flags &= ~MS_NOSEC; + if (!parse_fuse_opt((char *) data, &d, is_bdev)) goto err; -- cgit v1.2.3