From 3e3f6b4e2613627d4e971c44eec35e945b39e5e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:36:28 -0700 Subject: pnfs/blocklayout: remove some debugging The kbuild test robot complained that we got the printk format wrong. Let's just kill these printks instead of fixing them as there is not point after the initial tree algorithm debugging. Reported-by: kbuild test robot Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/blocklayout/extent_tree.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/nfs/blocklayout') diff --git a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/extent_tree.c b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/extent_tree.c index f34f61dd0d0b..43e891b3e0b6 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/extent_tree.c +++ b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/extent_tree.c @@ -370,9 +370,6 @@ ext_tree_split(struct rb_root *root, struct pnfs_block_extent *be, struct pnfs_block_extent *new; sector_t orig_len = be->be_length; - dprintk("%s: need split for 0x%lx:0x%lx at 0x%lx\n", - __func__, be->be_f_offset, ext_f_end(be), split); - new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_ATOMIC); if (!new) return -ENOMEM; @@ -387,11 +384,6 @@ ext_tree_split(struct rb_root *root, struct pnfs_block_extent *be, new->be_tag = be->be_tag; new->be_device = nfs4_get_deviceid(be->be_device); - dprintk("%s: got 0x%lx:0x%lx!\n", - __func__, be->be_f_offset, ext_f_end(be)); - dprintk("%s: got 0x%lx:0x%lx!\n", - __func__, new->be_f_offset, ext_f_end(new)); - __ext_tree_insert(root, new, false); return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3