From 1223f3db71ba7bbcf2e77c7a5d4f440c2a2fa9c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 19:07:49 -0500 Subject: platform_data: wilco-ec.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva --- include/linux/platform_data/wilco-ec.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/linux/platform_data') diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/wilco-ec.h b/include/linux/platform_data/wilco-ec.h index 25f46a939637..3e268e636b5b 100644 --- a/include/linux/platform_data/wilco-ec.h +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/wilco-ec.h @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ struct wilco_ec_response { u16 result; u16 data_size; u8 reserved[2]; - u8 data[0]; + u8 data[]; } __packed; /** -- cgit v1.2.3 From b31d1d2b1c3a8452f425b09ebd374ecd3ddd5179 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gwendal Grignou Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:59:02 -0700 Subject: platform/chrome: cros_ec_sensorhub: Allocate sensorhub resource before claiming sensors Allocate callbacks array before enumerating the sensors: The probe routine for these sensors (for instance cros_ec_sensors_probe) can be called within the sensorhub probe routine (cros_ec_sensors_probe()) Fixes: 145d59baff594 ("platform/chrome: cros_ec_sensorhub: Add FIFO support") Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou Reported-by: Douglas Anderson Tested-by: Douglas Anderson Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra --- include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_sensorhub.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'include/linux/platform_data') diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_sensorhub.h b/include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_sensorhub.h index c588be843f61..0ecce6aa69d5 100644 --- a/include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_sensorhub.h +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_sensorhub.h @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ int cros_ec_sensorhub_register_push_data(struct cros_ec_sensorhub *sensorhub, void cros_ec_sensorhub_unregister_push_data(struct cros_ec_sensorhub *sensorhub, u8 sensor_num); +int cros_ec_sensorhub_ring_allocate(struct cros_ec_sensorhub *sensorhub); int cros_ec_sensorhub_ring_add(struct cros_ec_sensorhub *sensorhub); void cros_ec_sensorhub_ring_remove(void *arg); int cros_ec_sensorhub_ring_fifo_enable(struct cros_ec_sensorhub *sensorhub, -- cgit v1.2.3