From b682b70d016f6aee20d91dcbaa319a932008a83a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marco Elver Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 10:05:56 +0100 Subject: compiler-context-analysis: Remove __assume_ctx_lock from initializers Remove __assume_ctx_lock() from lock initializers. Implicitly asserting an active context during initialization caused false-positive double-lock errors when acquiring a lock immediately after its initialization. Moving forward, guarded member initialization must either: 1. Use guard(type_init)(&lock) or scoped_guard(type_init, ...). 2. Use context_unsafe() for simple initialization. Reported-by: Bart Van Assche Signed-off-by: Marco Elver Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/57062131-e79e-42c2-aa0b-8f931cb8cac2@acm.org/ Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119094029.1344361-7-elver@google.com --- include/linux/spinlock.h | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/linux/spinlock.h') diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h index 7b11991c742a..e1e2f144af9b 100644 --- a/include/linux/spinlock.h +++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h @@ -106,12 +106,11 @@ do { \ static struct lock_class_key __key; \ \ __raw_spin_lock_init((lock), #lock, &__key, LD_WAIT_SPIN); \ - __assume_ctx_lock(lock); \ } while (0) #else # define raw_spin_lock_init(lock) \ - do { *(lock) = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lock); __assume_ctx_lock(lock); } while (0) + do { *(lock) = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lock); } while (0) #endif #define raw_spin_is_locked(lock) arch_spin_is_locked(&(lock)->raw_lock) @@ -324,7 +323,6 @@ do { \ \ __raw_spin_lock_init(spinlock_check(lock), \ #lock, &__key, LD_WAIT_CONFIG); \ - __assume_ctx_lock(lock); \ } while (0) #else @@ -333,7 +331,6 @@ do { \ do { \ spinlock_check(_lock); \ *(_lock) = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(_lock); \ - __assume_ctx_lock(_lock); \ } while (0) #endif -- cgit v1.2.3