From 7e60598785f30cf3dc9e476cc0fc3feeb37a0c63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Palmer Dabbelt Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:19:56 -0700 Subject: sched/wait: Change wait_on_bit*() to take an unsigned long *, not a void * The implementations of wait_on_bit*() will only work with long-aligned memory on systems that don't support misaligned loads and stores. This patch changes the function prototypes to ensure that the compiler will enforce alignment. Running make defconfig make KFLAGS="-Werror" seems to indicate that, as of c56fb6564dcd ("Fix a misaligned load inside ptrace_attach()"), there are now no users of non-long-aligned calls to wait_on_bit*(). I additionally tried a few "make randconfig" attempts, none of which failed to compile for this reason. Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Chris Metcalf Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: bobby.prani@gmail.com Cc: oleg@redhat.com Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: richard@nod.at Cc: vdavydov@parallels.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430453997-32459-3-git-send-email-palmer@dabbelt.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- include/linux/wait.h | 17 ++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/linux/wait.h') diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h index 2db83349865b..d69ac4ecc88b 100644 --- a/include/linux/wait.h +++ b/include/linux/wait.h @@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ extern int bit_wait_io_timeout(struct wait_bit_key *); * on that signal. */ static inline int -wait_on_bit(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode) +wait_on_bit(unsigned long *word, int bit, unsigned mode) { might_sleep(); if (!test_bit(bit, word)) @@ -994,7 +994,7 @@ wait_on_bit(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode) * on that signal. */ static inline int -wait_on_bit_io(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode) +wait_on_bit_io(unsigned long *word, int bit, unsigned mode) { might_sleep(); if (!test_bit(bit, word)) @@ -1020,7 +1020,8 @@ wait_on_bit_io(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode) * received a signal and the mode permitted wakeup on that signal. */ static inline int -wait_on_bit_timeout(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode, unsigned long timeout) +wait_on_bit_timeout(unsigned long *word, int bit, unsigned mode, + unsigned long timeout) { might_sleep(); if (!test_bit(bit, word)) @@ -1047,7 +1048,8 @@ wait_on_bit_timeout(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode, unsigned long timeout) * on that signal. */ static inline int -wait_on_bit_action(void *word, int bit, wait_bit_action_f *action, unsigned mode) +wait_on_bit_action(unsigned long *word, int bit, wait_bit_action_f *action, + unsigned mode) { might_sleep(); if (!test_bit(bit, word)) @@ -1075,7 +1077,7 @@ wait_on_bit_action(void *word, int bit, wait_bit_action_f *action, unsigned mode * the @mode allows that signal to wake the process. */ static inline int -wait_on_bit_lock(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode) +wait_on_bit_lock(unsigned long *word, int bit, unsigned mode) { might_sleep(); if (!test_and_set_bit(bit, word)) @@ -1099,7 +1101,7 @@ wait_on_bit_lock(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode) * the @mode allows that signal to wake the process. */ static inline int -wait_on_bit_lock_io(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode) +wait_on_bit_lock_io(unsigned long *word, int bit, unsigned mode) { might_sleep(); if (!test_and_set_bit(bit, word)) @@ -1125,7 +1127,8 @@ wait_on_bit_lock_io(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode) * the @mode allows that signal to wake the process. */ static inline int -wait_on_bit_lock_action(void *word, int bit, wait_bit_action_f *action, unsigned mode) +wait_on_bit_lock_action(unsigned long *word, int bit, wait_bit_action_f *action, + unsigned mode) { might_sleep(); if (!test_and_set_bit(bit, word)) -- cgit v1.2.3 From 9f3520c3115b451ac1301779fc3c769d94907a70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yuanhan Liu Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 18:19:05 +1000 Subject: wait: introduce wait_event_exclusive_cmd It's just a variant of wait_event_cmd(), with exclusive flag being set. For cases like RAID5, which puts many processes to sleep until 1/4 resources are free, a wake_up wakes up all processes to run, but there is one process being able to get the resource as it's protected by a spin lock. That ends up introducing heavy lock contentions, and hurts performance badly. Here introduce wait_event_exclusive_cmd to relieve the lock contention naturally by letting wake_up just wake up one process. Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra v2: its assumed that wait*() and __wait*() have the same arguments - peterz Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu Signed-off-by: NeilBrown --- include/linux/wait.h | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) (limited to 'include/linux/wait.h') diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h index 2db83349865b..db78c7204947 100644 --- a/include/linux/wait.h +++ b/include/linux/wait.h @@ -358,6 +358,19 @@ do { \ __ret; \ }) +#define __wait_event_exclusive_cmd(wq, condition, cmd1, cmd2) \ + (void)___wait_event(wq, condition, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 1, 0, \ + cmd1; schedule(); cmd2) +/* + * Just like wait_event_cmd(), except it sets exclusive flag + */ +#define wait_event_exclusive_cmd(wq, condition, cmd1, cmd2) \ +do { \ + if (condition) \ + break; \ + __wait_event_exclusive_cmd(wq, condition, cmd1, cmd2); \ +} while (0) + #define __wait_event_cmd(wq, condition, cmd1, cmd2) \ (void)___wait_event(wq, condition, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, 0, \ cmd1; schedule(); cmd2) -- cgit v1.2.3