From 500f8f9bced86f0c0f2482773bd64a1b7ec9c4e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 23:55:07 +0100 Subject: tick: Assume timekeeping is correctly handed over upon last offline idle call The timekeeping duty is handed over from the outgoing CPU on stop machine, then the oneshot tick is stopped right after. Therefore it's guaranteed that the current CPU isn't the timekeeper upon its last call to idle. Besides, calling tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() while the dying CPU goes into idle suggests that the tick is going to be stopped while it is actually stopped already from the appropriate CPU hotplug state. Remove the confusing call and the obsolete case handling and convert it to a sanity check that verifies the above assumption. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240225225508.11587-16-frederic@kernel.org --- include/linux/tick.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'include/linux') diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h index c7840ae8ebaf..44fddfa93e18 100644 --- a/include/linux/tick.h +++ b/include/linux/tick.h @@ -29,8 +29,10 @@ static inline void tick_cleanup_dead_cpu(int cpu) { } #if defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS) && defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) extern int tick_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu); +extern void tick_assert_timekeeping_handover(void); #else #define tick_cpu_dying NULL +static inline void tick_assert_timekeeping_handover(void) { } #endif #if defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS) && defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND) -- cgit v1.2.3