From c35fe2a68f29a0bda15ae994154cacaae5f69791 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Catalin Marinas Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:18:33 +0100 Subject: elf: Fix the arm64 MTE ELF segment name and value Unfortunately, the name/value choice for the MTE ELF segment type (PT_ARM_MEMTAG_MTE) was pretty poor: LOPROC+1 is already in use by PT_AARCH64_UNWIND, as defined in the AArch64 ELF ABI (https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aaelf64/aaelf64.rst). Update the ELF segment type value to LOPROC+2 and also change the define to PT_AARCH64_MEMTAG_MTE to match the AArch64 ELF ABI namespace. The AArch64 ELF ABI document is updating accordingly (segment type not previously mentioned in the document). Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Fixes: 761b9b366cec ("elf: Introduce the ARM MTE ELF segment type") Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Eric Biederman Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Luis Machado Cc: Richard Earnshaw Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220425151833.2603830-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- include/uapi/linux/elf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/uapi/linux') diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h index 787c657bfae8..7ce993e6786c 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ typedef __s64 Elf64_Sxword; /* ARM MTE memory tag segment type */ -#define PT_ARM_MEMTAG_MTE (PT_LOPROC + 0x1) +#define PT_AARCH64_MEMTAG_MTE (PT_LOPROC + 0x2) /* * Extended Numbering -- cgit v1.2.3 From d495f942f40aa412f8d4d65951152648cfa09903 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:30:13 +0200 Subject: KVM: fix bad user ABI for KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT When KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT was introduced, it included a flags member that at the time was unused. Unfortunately this extensibility mechanism has several issues: - x86 is not writing the member, so it would not be possible to use it on x86 except for new events - the member is not aligned to 64 bits, so the definition of the uAPI struct is incorrect for 32- on 64-bit userspace. This is a problem for RISC-V, which supports CONFIG_KVM_COMPAT, but fortunately usage of flags was only introduced in 5.18. Since padding has to be introduced, place a new field in there that tells if the flags field is valid. To allow further extensibility, in fact, change flags to an array of 16 values, and store how many of the values are valid. The availability of the new ndata field is tied to a system capability; all architectures are changed to fill in the field. To avoid breaking compilation of userspace that was using the flags field, provide a userspace-only union to overlap flags with data[0]. The new field is placed at the same offset for both 32- and 64-bit userspace. Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Marc Zyngier Cc: Peter Gonda Cc: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Reported-by: kernel test robot Message-Id: <20220422103013.34832-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/uapi/linux') diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h index 91a6fe4e02c0..6a184d260c7f 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h @@ -445,7 +445,13 @@ struct kvm_run { #define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_RESET 2 #define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_CRASH 3 __u32 type; - __u64 flags; + __u32 ndata; + union { +#ifndef __KERNEL__ + __u64 flags; +#endif + __u64 data[16]; + }; } system_event; /* KVM_EXIT_S390_STSI */ struct { @@ -1144,6 +1150,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt { #define KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP_EXTENSION 211 #define KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY 212 #define KVM_CAP_DISABLE_QUIRKS2 213 +/* #define KVM_CAP_VM_TSC_CONTROL 214 */ +#define KVM_CAP_SYSTEM_EVENT_DATA 215 #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING -- cgit v1.2.3