From 3660c2813fb6d0ba48ee44bcbf9feddf7218c11d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 09:24:02 -0800 Subject: rcu: Add ACCESS_ONCE() to ->n_force_qs_lh accesses The ->n_force_qs_lh field is accessed without the benefit of any synchronization, so this commit adds the needed ACCESS_ONCE() wrappers. Yes, increments to ->n_force_qs_lh can be lost, but contention should be low and the field is strictly statistical in nature, so this is not a problem. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett --- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/rcu/tree.c') diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index b3d116cd072d..e64157798624 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -2304,7 +2304,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp) if (rnp_old != NULL) raw_spin_unlock(&rnp_old->fqslock); if (ret) { - rsp->n_force_qs_lh++; + ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->n_force_qs_lh)++; return; } rnp_old = rnp; @@ -2316,7 +2316,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp) smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); raw_spin_unlock(&rnp_old->fqslock); if (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) { - rsp->n_force_qs_lh++; + ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->n_force_qs_lh)++; raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp_old->lock, flags); return; /* Someone beat us to it. */ } -- cgit v1.2.3