From 365187fbc04fd55766bf6a94e37e558505bf480a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:55:52 -0700 Subject: rcu: Update cpu_needs_another_gp() for futures from non-NOCB CPUs In the old days, the only source of requests for future grace periods was NOCB CPUs. This has changed: CPUs routinely post requests for future grace periods in order to promote power efficiency and reduce OS jitter with minimal impact on grace-period latency. This commit therefore updates cpu_needs_another_gp() to invoke rcu_future_needs_gp() instead of rcu_nocb_needs_gp(). The latter is no longer used, so is now removed. This commit also adds tracing for the irq_work_queue() wakeup case. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett --- kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 18 ------------------ 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h') diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h index f9c9057239a9..f60dd6ea8333 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h @@ -2067,19 +2067,6 @@ static int __init parse_rcu_nocb_poll(char *arg) } early_param("rcu_nocb_poll", parse_rcu_nocb_poll); -/* - * Do any no-CBs CPUs need another grace period? - * - * Interrupts must be disabled. If the caller does not hold the root - * rnp_node structure's ->lock, the results are advisory only. - */ -static int rcu_nocb_needs_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp) -{ - struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp); - - return rnp->need_future_gp[(ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->completed) + 1) & 0x1]; -} - /* * Wake up any no-CBs CPUs' kthreads that were waiting on the just-ended * grace period. @@ -2402,11 +2389,6 @@ static bool init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp) #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */ -static int rcu_nocb_needs_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp) -{ - return 0; -} - static void rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp) { } -- cgit v1.2.3