From 2b8dd87332cd2782b5b3f0c423bd6693e487ed30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Xu Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:58:30 -0600 Subject: bpf: Make bpf_session_cookie() kfunc return long * We will soon be generating kfunc prototypes from BTF. As part of that, we need to align the manual signatures in bpf_kfuncs.h with the actual kfunc definitions. There is currently a conflicting signature for bpf_session_cookie() w.r.t. return type. The original intent was to return long * and not __u64 *. You can see evidence of that intent in a3a5113393cc ("selftests/bpf: Add kprobe session cookie test"). Fix conflict by changing kfunc definition. Fixes: 5c919acef851 ("bpf: Add support for kprobe session cookie") Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7043e1c251ab33151d6e3830f8ea1902ed2604ac.1718207789.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/trace') diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index d1daeab1bbc1..bc16e21a2a44 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -3527,7 +3527,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc bool bpf_session_is_return(void) return session_ctx->is_return; } -__bpf_kfunc __u64 *bpf_session_cookie(void) +__bpf_kfunc long *bpf_session_cookie(void) { struct bpf_session_run_ctx *session_ctx; -- cgit v1.2.3 From cce4c40b960673f9e020835def310f1e89d3a940 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Xu Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:58:33 -0600 Subject: bpf: treewide: Align kfunc signatures to prog point-of-view Previously, kfunc declarations in bpf_kfuncs.h (and others) used "user facing" types for kfuncs prototypes while the actual kfunc definitions used "kernel facing" types. More specifically: bpf_dynptr vs bpf_dynptr_kern, __sk_buff vs sk_buff, and xdp_md vs xdp_buff. It wasn't an issue before, as the verifier allows aliased types. However, since we are now generating kfunc prototypes in vmlinux.h (in addition to keeping bpf_kfuncs.h around), this conflict creates compilation errors. Fix this conflict by using "user facing" types in kfunc definitions. This results in more casts, but otherwise has no additional runtime cost. Note, similar to 5b268d1ebcdc ("bpf: Have bpf_rdonly_cast() take a const pointer"), we also make kfuncs take const arguments where appropriate in order to make the kfunc more permissive. Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b58346a63a0e66bc9b7504da751b526b0b189a67.1718207789.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/trace') diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index bc16e21a2a44..4b3fda456299 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -1369,8 +1369,8 @@ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_key_put(struct bpf_key *bkey) #ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION /** * bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature - verify a PKCS#7 signature - * @data_ptr: data to verify - * @sig_ptr: signature of the data + * @data_p: data to verify + * @sig_p: signature of the data * @trusted_keyring: keyring with keys trusted for signature verification * * Verify the PKCS#7 signature *sig_ptr* against the supplied *data_ptr* @@ -1378,10 +1378,12 @@ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_key_put(struct bpf_key *bkey) * * Return: 0 on success, a negative value on error. */ -__bpf_kfunc int bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *data_ptr, - struct bpf_dynptr_kern *sig_ptr, +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(struct bpf_dynptr *data_p, + struct bpf_dynptr *sig_p, struct bpf_key *trusted_keyring) { + struct bpf_dynptr_kern *data_ptr = (struct bpf_dynptr_kern *)data_p; + struct bpf_dynptr_kern *sig_ptr = (struct bpf_dynptr_kern *)sig_p; const void *data, *sig; u32 data_len, sig_len; int ret; @@ -1444,7 +1446,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc_start_defs(); * bpf_get_file_xattr - get xattr of a file * @file: file to get xattr from * @name__str: name of the xattr - * @value_ptr: output buffer of the xattr value + * @value_p: output buffer of the xattr value * * Get xattr *name__str* of *file* and store the output in *value_ptr*. * @@ -1453,8 +1455,9 @@ __bpf_kfunc_start_defs(); * Return: 0 on success, a negative value on error. */ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_get_file_xattr(struct file *file, const char *name__str, - struct bpf_dynptr_kern *value_ptr) + struct bpf_dynptr *value_p) { + struct bpf_dynptr_kern *value_ptr = (struct bpf_dynptr_kern *)value_p; struct dentry *dentry; u32 value_len; void *value; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 717d6313bba1b3179f0bf1026aaec6b7e26f484e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiri Olsa Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 10:16:24 +0200 Subject: bpf: Change bpf_session_cookie return value to __u64 * This reverts [1] and changes return value for bpf_session_cookie in bpf selftests. Having long * might lead to problems on 32-bit architectures. Fixes: 2b8dd87332cd ("bpf: Make bpf_session_cookie() kfunc return long *") Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240619081624.1620152-1-jolsa@kernel.org --- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/trace') diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 4b3fda456299..cd098846e251 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -3530,7 +3530,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc bool bpf_session_is_return(void) return session_ctx->is_return; } -__bpf_kfunc long *bpf_session_cookie(void) +__bpf_kfunc __u64 *bpf_session_cookie(void) { struct bpf_session_run_ctx *session_ctx; -- cgit v1.2.3