From 19822a980e1956a6572998887a7df5a0607a32f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Xing Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:36:05 +0800 Subject: trace: tcp: fully support trace_tcp_send_reset Prior to this patch, what we can see by enabling trace_tcp_send is only happening under two circumstances: 1) active rst mode 2) non-active rst mode and based on the full socket That means the inconsistency occurs if we use tcpdump and trace simultaneously to see how rst happens. It's necessary that we should take into other cases into considerations, say: 1) time-wait socket 2) no socket ... By parsing the incoming skb and reversing its 4-tuple can we know the exact 'flow' which might not exist. Samples after applied this patch: 1. tcp_send_reset: skbaddr=XXX skaddr=XXX src=ip:port dest=ip:port state=TCP_ESTABLISHED 2. tcp_send_reset: skbaddr=000...000 skaddr=XXX src=ip:port dest=ip:port state=UNKNOWN Note: 1) UNKNOWN means we cannot extract the right information from skb. 2) skbaddr/skaddr could be 0 Signed-off-by: Jason Xing Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240401073605.37335-3-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c') diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c index 5ae74f661d25..cffebaec66f1 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c @@ -1113,7 +1113,6 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) if (sk) { oif = sk->sk_bound_dev_if; if (sk_fullsock(sk)) { - trace_tcp_send_reset(sk, skb); if (inet6_test_bit(REPFLOW, sk)) label = ip6_flowlabel(ipv6h); priority = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_priority); @@ -1129,6 +1128,8 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) label = ip6_flowlabel(ipv6h); } + trace_tcp_send_reset(sk, skb); + tcp_v6_send_response(sk, skb, seq, ack_seq, 0, 0, 0, oif, 1, ipv6_get_dsfield(ipv6h), label, priority, txhash, &key); -- cgit v1.2.3