From 707e634326448190bfe2d937c44ec05c8dea63c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Lamparter Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:29:53 +0100 Subject: Revert "mac80211: temporarily disable reorder release timer" This reverts enables the reorder release timer once again. The issues laid out in: Have been addressed by: mac80211: serialize rx path workers mac80211: ignore PSM bit of reordered frames Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter Signed-off-by: John W. Linville --- net/mac80211/rx.c | 24 ------------------------ 1 file changed, 24 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/mac80211') diff --git a/net/mac80211/rx.c b/net/mac80211/rx.c index 12cbb4df81aa..9595e564badd 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/rx.c +++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c @@ -628,26 +628,6 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_reorder_release(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, tid_agg_rx->buf_size; } - /* - * Disable the reorder release timer for now. - * - * The current implementation lacks a proper locking scheme - * which would protect vital statistic and debug counters - * from being updated by two different but concurrent BHs. - * - * More information about the topic is available from: - * - thread: http://marc.info/?t=128635927000001 - * - * What was wrong: - * => http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=128636170811964 - * "Basically the thing is that until your patch, the data - * in the struct didn't actually need locking because it - * was accessed by the RX path only which is not concurrent." - * - * List of what needs to be fixed: - * => http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=128656352920957 - * - if (tid_agg_rx->stored_mpdu_num) { j = index = seq_sub(tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num, tid_agg_rx->ssn) % tid_agg_rx->buf_size; @@ -666,10 +646,6 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_reorder_release(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, } else { del_timer(&tid_agg_rx->reorder_timer); } - */ - -set_release_timer: - return; } /* -- cgit v1.2.3