From 95ddc1fc4519ed48ddc7d622bd5c84dff3eebb0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vladimir Kondratiev Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:25:50 +0300 Subject: cfg80211: bitrate calculation for 60g 60g band uses different from .11n MCS scheme, so bitrate should be calculated differently Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg --- net/wireless/util.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+) (limited to 'net/wireless') diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c index 6e52726f7fe3..e31f1dba79ec 100644 --- a/net/wireless/util.c +++ b/net/wireless/util.c @@ -900,12 +900,61 @@ int cfg80211_change_iface(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, return err; } +static u32 cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_60g(struct rate_info *rate) +{ + static const u32 __mcs2bitrate[] = { + /* control PHY */ + [0] = 275, + /* SC PHY */ + [1] = 3850, + [2] = 7700, + [3] = 9625, + [4] = 11550, + [5] = 12512, /* 1251.25 mbps */ + [6] = 15400, + [7] = 19250, + [8] = 23100, + [9] = 25025, + [10] = 30800, + [11] = 38500, + [12] = 46200, + /* OFDM PHY */ + [13] = 6930, + [14] = 8662, /* 866.25 mbps */ + [15] = 13860, + [16] = 17325, + [17] = 20790, + [18] = 27720, + [19] = 34650, + [20] = 41580, + [21] = 45045, + [22] = 51975, + [23] = 62370, + [24] = 67568, /* 6756.75 mbps */ + /* LP-SC PHY */ + [25] = 6260, + [26] = 8340, + [27] = 11120, + [28] = 12510, + [29] = 16680, + [30] = 22240, + [31] = 25030, + }; + + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rate->mcs >= ARRAY_SIZE(__mcs2bitrate))) + return 0; + + return __mcs2bitrate[rate->mcs]; +} + u32 cfg80211_calculate_bitrate(struct rate_info *rate) { int modulation, streams, bitrate; if (!(rate->flags & RATE_INFO_FLAGS_MCS)) return rate->legacy; + if (rate->flags & RATE_INFO_FLAGS_60G) + return cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_60g(rate); /* the formula below does only work for MCS values smaller than 32 */ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rate->mcs >= 32)) -- cgit v1.2.3