From bb0c70bcca6ba3c84afc2da7426f3b923bbe6825 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 21:35:32 +0800
Subject: arm64: KVM: Add a new vcpu device control group for PMUv3

To configure the virtual PMUv3 overflow interrupt number, we use the
vcpu kvm_device ioctl, encapsulating the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ
attribute within the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL group.

After configuring the PMUv3, call the vcpu ioctl with attribute
KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT to initialize the PMUv3.

Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+)

(limited to 'virt/kvm')

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
index 6e28f4f86cc6..b5754c6c5508 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/kvm.h>
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
+#include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
 #include <kvm/arm_pmu.h>
 #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
@@ -415,3 +416,114 @@ bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void)
 	 */
 	return (perf_num_counters() > 0);
 }
+
+static int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features) ||
+	    !kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
+		return -ENXIO;
+
+	if (kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(vcpu))
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(vcpu);
+	vcpu->arch.pmu.ready = true;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static bool irq_is_valid(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, bool is_ppi)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+
+	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
+		if (!kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
+			continue;
+
+		if (is_ppi) {
+			if (vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num != irq)
+				return false;
+		} else {
+			if (vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num == irq)
+				return false;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+
+int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
+{
+	switch (attr->attr) {
+	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ: {
+		int __user *uaddr = (int __user *)(long)attr->addr;
+		int irq;
+
+		if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
+			return -ENODEV;
+
+		if (get_user(irq, uaddr))
+			return -EFAULT;
+
+		/*
+		 * The PMU overflow interrupt could be a PPI or SPI, but for one
+		 * VM the interrupt type must be same for each vcpu. As a PPI,
+		 * the interrupt number is the same for all vcpus, while as an
+		 * SPI it must be a separate number per vcpu.
+		 */
+		if (irq < VGIC_NR_SGIS || irq >= vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs ||
+		    !irq_is_valid(vcpu->kvm, irq, irq < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		if (kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
+			return -EBUSY;
+
+		kvm_debug("Set kvm ARM PMU irq: %d\n", irq);
+		vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num = irq;
+		return 0;
+	}
+	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT:
+		return kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init(vcpu);
+	}
+
+	return -ENXIO;
+}
+
+int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
+{
+	switch (attr->attr) {
+	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ: {
+		int __user *uaddr = (int __user *)(long)attr->addr;
+		int irq;
+
+		if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
+			return -ENODEV;
+
+		if (!kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
+			return -ENXIO;
+
+		irq = vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num;
+		return put_user(irq, uaddr);
+	}
+	}
+
+	return -ENXIO;
+}
+
+int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
+{
+	switch (attr->attr) {
+	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ:
+	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT:
+		if (kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3() &&
+		    test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
+			return 0;
+	}
+
+	return -ENXIO;
+}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3