summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/README.atmel_pmecc21
-rw-r--r--doc/README.scrapyard30
-rw-r--r--doc/driver-model/README.txt8
3 files changed, 46 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/doc/README.atmel_pmecc b/doc/README.atmel_pmecc
index cf8373b54e8..cc0f73db8f1 100644
--- a/doc/README.atmel_pmecc
+++ b/doc/README.atmel_pmecc
@@ -27,3 +27,24 @@ Take AT91SAM9X5EK as an example, the board definition file likes:
#define CONFIG_ATMEL_NAND_HW_PMECC 1
#define CONFIG_PMECC_CAP 2
#define CONFIG_PMECC_SECTOR_SIZE 512
+
+How to enable PMECC header for direct programmable boot.bin
+-----------------------------------------------------------
+2014-05-19 Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
+
+The usual way to program SPL into NAND flash is to use the SAM-BA Atmel tool.
+This however is often not usable when doing field updates. To be able to
+program a SPL binary into NAND flash we need to add the PMECC header to the
+binary before. Chapter '12.4.4.1 NAND Flash Boot: NAND Flash Detection' in
+sama5d3 SoC spec (as of 03. April 2014) defines how this PMECC header has to
+look like. In order to do so we have a new image type added to mkimage to
+generate this PMECC header and integrated this into the build process of SPL.
+
+To enable the generation of atmel PMECC header for SPL one need to define
+CONFIG_SPL_GENERATE_ATMEL_PMECC_HEADER. The required parameters are taken from
+board configuration and compiled into the host tools atmel_pmecc_params. This
+tool will be called in build process to parametrize mkimage for atmelimage
+type. The mkimage tool has intentionally _not_ compiled in those parameters.
+
+The mkimage image type atmelimage also set the 6'th interrupt vector to the
+correct value. This feature can also be used to setup a boot.bin for MMC boot.
diff --git a/doc/README.scrapyard b/doc/README.scrapyard
index f9742e7d494..e2157e08bea 100644
--- a/doc/README.scrapyard
+++ b/doc/README.scrapyard
@@ -11,15 +11,27 @@ easily if here is something they might want to dig for...
Board Arch CPU Commit Removed Last known maintainer/contact
=================================================================================================
-lubbock arm pxa - 2014-04-04 Kyle Harris <kharris@nexus-tech.net>
-MOUSSE powerpc mpc824x - 2014-04-04
-rsdproto powerpc mpc8260 - 2014-04-04
-RPXsuper powerpc mpc8260 - 2014-04-04
-RPXClassic powerpc mpc8xx - 2014-04-04
-RPXlite powerpc mpc8xx - 2014-04-04
-genietv powerpc mpc8xx - 2014-04-04
-mbx8xx powerpc mpc8xx - 2014-04-04
-nx823 powerpc mpc8xx - 2014-04-04
+hidden_dragon powerpc mpc824x - - Yusdi Santoso <yusdi_santoso@adaptec.com>
+debris powerpc mpc824x - - Sangmoon Kim <dogoil@etinsys.com>
+kvme080 powerpc mpc824x - - Sangmoon Kim <dogoil@etinsys.com>
+ep8248 powerpc mpc8260 - - Yuli Barcohen <yuli@arabellasw.com>
+ispan powerpc mpc8260 - - Yuli Barcohen <yuli@arabellasw.com>
+rattler powerpc mpc8260 - - Yuli Barcohen <yuli@arabellasw.com>
+zpc1900 powerpc mpc8260 - - Yuli Barcohen <yuli@arabellasw.com>
+mpc8260ads powerpc mpc8260 - - Yuli Barcohen <yuli@arabellasw.com>
+adder powerpc mpc8xx - - Yuli Barcohen <yuli@arabellasw.com>
+quad100hd powerpc ppc405ep - - Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn@googlemail.com>
+lubbock arm pxa 36bf57b 2014-04-18 Kyle Harris <kharris@nexus-tech.net>
+EVB64260 powerpc mpc824x bb3aef9 2014-04-18
+MOUSSE powerpc mpc824x 03f2ecc 2014-04-18
+rsdproto powerpc mpc8260 8b043e6 2014-04-18
+RPXsuper powerpc mpc8260 0ebf5f5 2014-04-18
+RPXClassic powerpc mpc8xx 4fb3925 2014-04-18
+RPXlite powerpc mpc8xx 4fb3925 2014-04-18
+FADS powerpc mpc8xx aa6e1e4 2014-04-18
+genietv powerpc mpc8xx b8a49bd 2014-04-18
+mbx8xx powerpc mpc8xx d6b11fd 2014-04-18
+nx823 powerpc mpc8xx a146e8b 2014-04-18
idmr m68k mcf52x2 ba650e9b 2014-01-28
M5271EVB m68k mcf52x2 ba650e9b 2014-01-28
dvl_host arm ixp e317de6b 2014-01-28 Michael Schwingen <michael@schwingen.org>
diff --git a/doc/driver-model/README.txt b/doc/driver-model/README.txt
index e0b395a6186..dcecb9a8c0a 100644
--- a/doc/driver-model/README.txt
+++ b/doc/driver-model/README.txt
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ What is going on?
Let's start at the top. The demo command is in common/cmd_demo.c. It does
the usual command procesing and then:
- struct device *demo_dev;
+ struct udevice *demo_dev;
ret = uclass_get_device(UCLASS_DEMO, devnum, &demo_dev);
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ this particular device may use one or other of them.
The code for demo_hello() is in drivers/demo/demo-uclass.c:
-int demo_hello(struct device *dev, int ch)
+int demo_hello(struct udevice *dev, int ch)
{
const struct demo_ops *ops = device_get_ops(dev);
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ int demo_hello(struct device *dev, int ch)
As you can see it just calls the relevant driver method. One of these is
in drivers/demo/demo-simple.c:
-static int simple_hello(struct device *dev, int ch)
+static int simple_hello(struct udevice *dev, int ch)
{
const struct dm_demo_pdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ instead of struct instance, struct platdata, etc.)
this concept relates to a class of drivers (or a subsystem). We shouldn't
use 'class' since it is a C++ reserved word, so U-Boot class (uclass) seems
better than 'core'.
-- Remove 'struct driver_instance' and just use a single 'struct device'.
+- Remove 'struct driver_instance' and just use a single 'struct udevice'.
This removes a level of indirection that doesn't seem necessary.
- Built in device tree support, to avoid the need for platdata
- Removed the concept of driver relocation, and just make it possible for