| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This is a collection of all the whitespace, renames, comment, and other
changes that should not change the DT functionality from Linux v6.3-rc6.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
|
|
Registers for adjusting the spread spectrum clocking (SSC) have been
added. As reported by the TI spruh73x RM, SSC is supported only for LCD
and MPU PLLs, but the CM_SSC_DELTAMSTEP_DPLL_XXX and
CM_SSC_MODFREQDIV_DPLL_XXX registers, as well as the enable field in the
CM_CLKMODE_DPLL_XXX registers are mapped for all PLLs (CORE, MPU, DDR,
PER, DISP).
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210606202253.31649-4-dariobin@libero.it
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
|
|
The commit 6337d53fdf45 ("arm: dts: sync am33xx with Linux 5.9-rc7")
synchronized the am33xx-clocks.dtsi file with Linux 5.9-rc7 with the
exception of two nodes. I think I was wrong and it is better to keep
the two files similar and possibly make changes to the *-u-boot.dtsi
files.
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
|
|
Move gpio controller nodes from am33xx.dtsi to am33xx-l4.dtsi. Now both
files are more similar to those found in Linux 5.9-rc7. To be fully
operational as before it was also necessary to fix the am33xx-clock.dtsi
file. It too is now almost the same as the Linux kernel.
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
|
|
There have been several changes to the am33xx.dtsi, so this patch
re-syncs it with Linux.
Let's add proper interconnect hierarchy for l4 interconnect instances
with the related ti-sysc interconnect module data as documented in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/ti-sysc.txt of the Linux kernel.
With l4 interconnect hierarchy and ti-sysc interconnect target module
data in place, we can simply move all the related child devices to their
proper location and enable probing using ti-sysc.
The am33xx-clock.dtsi file is the same as that of the Linux kernel,
except for the reg property of the node l4-wkup-clkctrl@0.
As for the am33xx.dtsi file, all the devices with drivers not yet
implemented and those I was able to test with this patch have been moved
to am33xx-l4.dtsi. In case of any regressions, problem devices can be
reverted by moving them back and removing the related interconnect
target module node.
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
|
|
This patch synchronizes the am33xx SoC specific files with those from
Linux 4.20.0. Hence all board maintainers of am33xx based boards are
on the cc list.
The main purpose of this patch is to prevent further diverging of the
dts files from U-Boot and those from Linux. It aims to set the stage
for the synchronization of board specific dts files. Example: I'm the
maintainer of the PDU001 board: once this patch is applied successfully
I will make changes to the board specific dts file in Linux only and
then post a patch with a copy of this exact dts file to U-Boot. This
will make U-Boot and Linux remain in sync.
The stumbling block of https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/943627 was
removed by the patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/962428 from
Lokesh Vutla (many thanks!). This omap-serial driver allows using the
Linux am33xx.dtsi file in U-Boot.
Other changes to dts and dtsi files made by this patch are mainly to
prevent _new_ warnings during the build process. Especially the warning
at pinmux@800 stating 'unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without
"ranges" or child "reg"' was not removed. This warning is a good example
showing the benefit of the synchronization: if it needs to be fixed it
will be fixed in Linux and ported back to U-Boot.
Buildman reports all 46 am33xx SoC based boards to build fine, with
warnings of course. Nevertheless this patch should be tested thoroughly
on as many boards as possible to prevent any collateral damage.
Signed-off-by: Felix Brack <fb@ltec.ch>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
- Re-sync DT files for am33xx with Linux Kernel v4.1
- Include DT file now for the "AM335x GP EVM" and build target for it,
via device tree and DM.
- We only need to provide platform data for UART when OF_CONTROL isn't
also enabled really. We can just push GPIO to coming from DT
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
