| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> says:
When the SPL build-phase was first created it was designed to solve a
particular problem (the need to init SDRAM so that U-Boot proper could
be loaded). It has since expanded to become an important part of U-Boot,
with three phases now present: TPL, VPL and SPL
Due to this history, the term 'SPL' is used to mean both a particular
phase (the one before U-Boot proper) and all the non-proper phases.
This has become confusing.
For a similar reason CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is set to 'y' for all 'SPL'
phases, not just SPL. So code which can only be compiled for actual SPL,
for example, must use something like this:
#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) && !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD)
In Makefiles we have similar issues. SPL_ has been used as a variable
which expands to either SPL_ or nothing, to chose between options like
CONFIG_BLK and CONFIG_SPL_BLK. When TPL appeared, a new SPL_TPL variable
was created which expanded to 'SPL_', 'TPL_' or nothing. Later it was
updated to support 'VPL_' as well.
This series starts a change in terminology and usage to resolve the
above issues:
- The word 'xPL' is used instead of 'SPL' to mean a non-proper build
- A new CONFIG_XPL_BUILD define indicates that the current build is an
'xPL' build
- The existing CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is changed to mean SPL; it is not now
defined for TPL and VPL phases
- The existing SPL_ Makefile variable is renamed to SPL_
- The existing SPL_TPL Makefile variable is renamed to PHASE_
It should be noted that xpl_phase() can generally be used instead of
the above CONFIGs without a code-space or run-time penalty.
This series does not attempt to convert all of U-Boot to use this new
terminology but it makes a start. In particular, renaming spl.h and
common/spl seems like a bridge too far at this point.
The series is fully bisectable. It has also been checked to ensure there
are no code-size changes on any commit.
|
|
Use PHASE_ as the symbol to select a particular XPL build. This means
that SPL_TPL_ is no-longer set.
Update the comment in bootstage to refer to this symbol, instead of
SPL_
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Use XPL_ as the symbol to indicate an SPL build. This means that SPL_ is
no-longer set.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Complete this rename for all directories outside arch/ board/ drivers/
and include/
Use the new symbol to refer to any 'SPL' build, including TPL and VPL
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Rename this function to indicate that it refers to any xPL phase.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Use the normal SPL_TPL_ approach for this option.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
%s/boormethod/bootmethod/
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
|
|
Add a little debugging so we can see what is happening.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
|
|
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dfu into next
u-boot-dfu-next-20241003
CI: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dfu/-/pipelines/22516
DFU:
- Reinitialize only if dfu_alt_info changed
USB Gadget:
- New usb gadget driver for Renesas USBHS
- Simplify kconfig deps for CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE
Android:
- Provide bootloader version to android via kernel commandline
|
|
Before
commit da3447d09fa0 ("android: Fix ramdisk loading for bootimage v3+"),
the ramdisk was loaded from img_data.ramdisk_ptr, ignoring offset
provided via mkbootimg.
commit da3447d09fa0 ("android: Fix ramdisk loading for bootimage v3+")
rightfully fixes this by switching to use img_data.ramdisk_addr instead.
However, it does not copy the ramdisk content to img_data.ramdisk_addr
in case we use boot image v2.
Because of this, we can no longer boot Android on Khadas vim3 board:
[ 3.940361] RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0.
Add the missing memcpy() to fix the issue.
Fixes: da3447d09fa0 ("android: Fix ramdisk loading for bootimage v3+")
Signed-off-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
|
|
All three addresses printed are in hexadecimal format, but only the
first two have the "0x" prefix. The patch aligns the format of the
"end" address with the other two by adding the "0x" prefix.
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
When booting into Android fastbootd (a subset of recovery), the default
UI shows the bootloader version in the screen [1].
This is done via the ro.bootloader property which should come from the
bootloader.
Provide the U-Boot version via a kernel commandline argument so that
fastbootd can show it properly on the screen.
[1] https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bootable/recovery/+/refs/heads/main/fastboot/fastboot.cpp#42
Reviewed-by: Julien Masson <jmasson@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240912-bootmeth-bootloader-version-v2-1-76d4c0b45024@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
|
|
Prepare v2024.10-rc5
|
|
The EFI_LOADER and EFI config options are randomly scattered under lib/
making it cumbersome to navigate and enable options, unless you really
know what you are doing. On top of that the existing options are in
random order instead of a logical one.
So let's move things around a bit and move them under boot/. Present a
generic UEFI entry where people can select Capsules, Protocols,
Services, and an option to compile U-Boot as an EFI for X86
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
The backup offset is in bytes, but was incorrectly be interpreted as
blocks, leading to it being written to the wrong location. Fix the
calculation, clarify that ANDROID_AB_BACKUP_OFFSET is in bytes and must
be a multiple of the block size, and add a runtime check to validate the
offset.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
Fixes: 3430f24bc69d ("android_ab: Try backup booloader_message")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240828143924.3987331-1-JPEWhacker@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
|
|
Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org> says:
This is a follow-up from an earlier RFC series [1] for making the LMB
and EFI memory allocations work together. This is a non-rfc version
with only the LMB part of the patches, for making the LMB memory map
global and persistent.
This is part one of a set of patches which aim to have the LMB and EFI
memory allocations work together. This requires making the LMB memory
map global and persistent, instead of having local, caller specific
maps. This is being done keeping in mind the usage of LMB memory by
platforms where the same memory region can be used to load multiple
different images. What is not allowed is to overwrite memory that has
been allocated by the other module, currently the EFI memory
module. This is being achieved by introducing a new flag,
LMB_NOOVERWRITE, which represents memory which cannot be re-requested
once allocated.
The data structures (alloced lists) required for maintaining the LMB
map are initialised during board init. The LMB module is enabled by
default for the main U-Boot image, while it needs to be enabled for
SPL. This version also uses a stack implementation, as suggested by
Simon Glass to temporarily store the lmb structure instance which is
used during normal operation when running lmb tests. This does away
with the need to run the lmb tests separately.
The tests have been tweaked where needed because of these changes.
The second part of the patches, to be sent subsequently, would work on
having the EFI allocations work with the LMB API's.
[1] - https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20240704073544.670249-1-sughosh.ganu@linaro.org/T/#t
Notes:
1) These patches are on next, as the alist patches have been
applied to that branch.
2) I have tested the boot on the ST DK2 board, but it would be good to
get a T-b/R-b from the ST maintainers.
3) It will be good to test these changes on a PowerPC platform
(ideally an 85xx, as I do not have one).
|
|
Remove a couple of superfluous LMB stub functions, and instead put a
check for calling the lmb_reserve() function.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
With the move to make the LMB allocations persistent and the common
memory regions being reserved during board init, there is no need for
an explicit reservation of a memory range. Remove the
lmb_init_and_reserve_range() function.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
With the introduction of separate config symbols for the SPL phase of
U-Boot, the condition checks need to be tweaked so that platforms that
enable the LMB module in SPL are also able to call the LMB API's. Use
the appropriate condition checks to achieve this.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
The current LMB API's for allocating and reserving memory use a
per-caller based memory view. Memory allocated by a caller can then be
overwritten by another caller. Make these allocations and reservations
persistent using the alloced list data structure.
Two alloced lists are declared -- one for the available(free) memory,
and one for the used memory. Once full, the list can then be extended
at runtime.
[sjg: Use a stack to store pointer of lmb struct when running lmb tests]
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[sjg: Optimise the logic to add a region in lmb_add_region_flags()]
|
|
Prepare v2024.10-rc4
|
|
Use the API function list_count_nodes() to count the number of list
entries.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> says:
This little series tries to resolve a problem found with an earlier
fix.
|
|
When a device fails to probe, the next device should be tried, until
either we find a suitable device or run out of devices. A device
should never be tried twice.
When we run out of devices of a particular priority, the hunter should
be used to generate devices of the next priority. Only if all attempts
fail should this function return an error.
Update the function to use the latent 'found' boolean to determine
whether another loop iteration is warranted, rather than setting 'dev'
to NULL, which creates confusion, suggesting that no devices have been
scanned and the whole process is starting from the beginning.
Note that the upcoming bootflow_efi() test is used to test this
behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Fixes: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dm/-/issues/17
|
|
This turns out to be insufficient to fix the problem, since when
bootdev_next_prio() exits, the caller has no idea that this really
is the end. Nor is it, since there may be other devices which should
be checked.
The caller iterates which calls iter_incr() which calls
bootdev_next_prio() again, which finds the same device and the loop
continues.
We never did create a test for this[1], which makes it hard to be
sure which problem was fixed.
The original code had the virtue of staying in the loop looking for a
bootdev, so let's go back to that and try to fix this another way.
A future patch will make bootdev_next_prio() continue after failure
which should provide same effect.
This reverts commit 9d92c418acfb7576e12e2bd53fed294bb9543724.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
android_image_get_ramdisk() will return an error if there is no ramdisk.
Using the android image without a ramdisk worked until commit
1ce8e10f3b4b ("image: Fix up ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE ramdisk code") because
the return code wasn't checked until then. Return -ENOENT in case
there is no ramdisk and translate that into -ENOPKG in the calling
code, which will then indicate "no ramdisk" to its caller
(boot_get_ramdisk()).
This way, we can get rid of the "*rd_data = *rd_len = 0;" in the error
path, too.
With this, I'm able to boot a linux kernel using fastboot again:
fastboot --base 0x41000000 --header-version 2 --dtb /path/to/dtb \
--cmdline "root=/dev/mmcblk0p1 rootwait" boot path/to/Image
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240729213657.2550935-1-mwalle@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
|
|
Prepare v2024.10-rc3
|
|
For SATA devices the class name is 'ahci' but the block device name is
'sata'.
Use function blk_get_uclass_name() to retrieve the correct string.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Read the UPL early in boot so that it is available. For now none of the
information is used.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Specify the FIT and include information about each loaded image, as
required by the UPL handoff.
Write the UPL handoff into the bloblist before jumping to the next phase.
Control this using a runtime flag to avoid conflicting with other
handoff mechanisms.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Add the basic code to create a handoff structure in SPL, so it can be
passed to the next phase. For now this is not plumbed in.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Add a 'upl' command to work with Universal Payload features. For now it
only supports reading and writing a handoff structure.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Universal Payload provides a standard way of handing off control between
two firmware phases. Add support for writing the handoff information from
a structure.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Universal Payload provides a standard way of handing off control between
two firmware phases. Add support for reading the handoff information into
a structure.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
USB is stopped using driver model now, in dm_remove_devices_flags() in
announce_and_cleanup() at the top of this file.
The usb_stop() call actually unbinds devices.
When a USB device is unbound, it causes any bootflows attached to it to
be removed, via a call to bootdev_clear_bootflows() from
bootdev_pre_unbind(). This obviously makes it impossible to boot the
bootflow.
However, when booting a bootflow that relies on USB, usb_stop() is
called, which unbinds the device. At that point any information
attached to the bootflow is dropped.
This is quite risky since the contents of freed memory are not
guaranteed to remain unchanged. Depending on what other options are
done before boot, a hard-to-find bug may crop up.
Drop the call to this old function.
Leave the netconsole call there, since this needs conversion to
driver model.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Suggested-by: Shantur Rathore <i@shantur.com>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
|
|
U-Boot is often used conjunction with QEMU to boot via EFI or syslinux.
Here the QFW boot method is not needed.
At least for qemu-riscv64_smode_defconfig the kernel parameter is used
to specify the U-Boot binary. Trying to run U-Boot as a kernel makes
no sense.
Provide Kconfig parameter CONFIG_BOOTMETH_QFW to decide if the QFW boot
method shall be provided.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
A valid memory location to stash bootstage information at will be
architecture dependent. Move the existing defaults to the main Kconfig
file for this option and set 0x0 as the default only for sandbox.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Fix a minor indentation / whitespace problem in a comment.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glkp@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
|
|
When reading a script from a network, no block device is available.
Update the implementation to support this correctly, avoiding setting
environment variables which relate only to block devices.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
|
|
Fix a typo in the comment and add one to the EFI driver too.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
|
|
Add documentation for the sandbox bootmeth.
Fix up the compatible string to drop the 'extlinux' part, which is not
relevant to this bootmeth.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
|
|
Add documentation for the qfw bootmeth.
Fix up the compatible string to drop the 'extlinux' part, which is not
relevant to this bootmeth.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
|
|
Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> says:
Android boot flow is a bit different than a regular Linux distro.
Android relies on multiple partitions in order to boot.
A typical boot flow would be:
1. Parse the Bootloader Control Block (BCB, misc partition)
2. If BCB requested bootonce-bootloader, start fastboot and wait.
3. If BCB requested recovery or normal android, run the following:
a. Get slot (A/B) from BCB
b. Run AVB (Android Verified Boot) on boot partitions
c. Load boot and vendor_boot partitions
d. Load device-tree, ramdisk and boot
The AOSP documentation has more details at [1], [2], [3]
This has been implemented via complex boot scripts such as [4].
However, these boot script are neither very maintainable nor generic.
Moreover, DISTRO_DEFAULTS is being deprecated [5].
Add a generic Android bootflow implementation for bootstd.
For this initial version, only boot image v4 is supported.
This has been tested on sandbox using:
$ ./test/py/test.py --bd sandbox --build -k test_ut
This has also been tested on the AM62X SK EVM using TI's Android SDK[6]
To test on TI board, the following (WIP) patch is needed as well:
https://gitlab.baylibre.com/baylibre/ti/ti-u-boot/-/commit/84cceb912bccd7cdd7f9dd69bca0e5d987a1fd04
[1] https://source.android.com/docs/core/architecture/bootloader
[2] https://source.android.com/docs/core/architecture/partitions
[3] https://source.android.com/docs/core/architecture/partitions/generic-boot
[4] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/include/configs/meson64_android.h
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/r/all/20230914165615.1058529-17-sjg@chromium.org/
[6] https://software-dl.ti.com/processor-sdk-android/esd/AM62X/09_02_00/docs/android/Overview.html
|
|
Android boot flow is a bit different than a regular Linux distro.
Android relies on multiple partitions in order to boot.
A typical boot flow would be:
1. Parse the Bootloader Control Block (BCB, misc partition)
2. If BCB requested bootonce-bootloader, start fastboot and wait.
3. If BCB requested recovery or normal android, run the following:
3.a. Get slot (A/B) from BCB
3.b. Run AVB (Android Verified Boot) on boot partitions
3.c. Load boot and vendor_boot partitions
3.d. Load device-tree, ramdisk and boot
The AOSP documentation has more details at [1], [2], [3]
This has been implemented via complex boot scripts such as [4].
However, these boot script are neither very maintainable nor generic.
Moreover, DISTRO_DEFAULTS is being deprecated [5].
Add a generic Android bootflow implementation for bootstd.
For this initial version, only boot image v4 is supported.
[1] https://source.android.com/docs/core/architecture/bootloader
[2] https://source.android.com/docs/core/architecture/partitions
[3] https://source.android.com/docs/core/architecture/partitions/generic-boot
[4] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/include/configs/meson64_android.h
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/r/all/20230914165615.1058529-17-sjg@chromium.org/
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julien Masson <jmasson@baylibre.com>
Tested-by: Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
|
|
Some bootflows might be able to only boot from MMC devices.
Add a helper function these bootflows can use.
Reviewed-by: Igor Opaniuk <igor.opaniuk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Masson <jmasson@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@baylibre.com>
Tested-by: Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
When calling android_image_get_dtb_by_index() using boot image v3+,
we should also pass the vendor_boot ramdisk address.
Use get_avendor_bootimg_addr() to do so.
Notes: on boot image v2, this is harmless since get_avendor_bootimg_addr()
returns -1.
for legacy implementations that don't have CMD_ABOOTIMG, add a weak
implementation to avoid linking errors.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julien Masson <jmasson@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Opaniuk <igor.opaniuk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@baylibre.com>
Tested-by: Guillaume La Roque <glaroque@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
|
|
Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@arm.com> says:
Hi,
This is a respin of this patch [1] after discussion [2]. Thanks to
Simon and Heinrich for their reviews.
To use the guidcmp() function, as suggested by Heinrich, we need to
make it available to bootmeth_cros.c and I think that the cleanest way
to do that is (arguably) to move the guid helper functions to efi.h
near the efi_guid_t definition; this is why the original patch has now
become a series of two patches.
The alternative would be to include efi_loader.h from bootmeth_cros.c
but I think this does not sound "right". If this is in fact the
preferred approach just let me know and I will respin.
There is no difference in the sandbox binaries before/after this
series on Arm and on PC, and all the tests I have run on the sandbox
are unchanged.
|
|
The scan_part() function uses a struct uuid to store the little-endian
partition type GUID, but this structure should be used only to contain a
big-endian UUID. Use an efi_guid_t instead and use guidcmp() for the
comparison.
Suggested-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@arm.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Drop all duplicate newlines. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
|
