| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The call to malloc() is a bit strange. The naming of the arguments
suggests that an address is passed, but in fact it is a pointer, at
least in the board_init_r() function and SPL equivalent.
Update it to work as described. Add a function comment as well.
Note that this does adjustment does not extend into the malloc()
implementation itself, apart from changing mem_malloc_init(), since
there are lots of casts and pointers and integers are used
interchangeably.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
Since U-Boot does not support memory overcommit we can
enforce that the allocation size is within the malloc area.
This is a simple and efficient hardening measure to mitigate
further integer overflows in dlmalloc.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Make sure that the new break is within mem_malloc_start
and mem_malloc_end before making progress.
ulong new = old + increment; can overflow for extremely large
increment values and memset() can get wrongly called.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
req is of type size_t, casting it to long opens the door
for an integer overflow.
Values between LONG_MAX - (SIZE_SZ + MALLOC_ALIGN_MASK) - 1 and LONG_MAX
cause and overflow such that request2size() returns MINSIZE.
Fix by removing the cast.
The origin of the cast is unclear, it's in u-boot and ppcboot since ever
and predates the CVS history.
Doug Lea's original dlmalloc implementation also doesn't have it.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
At present in tests it is possible to cause an out-of-memory condition
with malloc() but not realloc(). Add support to realloc() too, so code
which uses that function can be tested.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Drop all duplicate newlines. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
|
|
As part of bringing the master branch back in to next, we need to allow
for all of these changes to exist here.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Remove <common.h> from all "commmon/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
The pedantic mode is run-time contolled, so
appropriate registry take place everytime.
Maybe it's worth to use compile-time control only.
So, the registry could be optimized out by an #ifdef.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Uriev <eugeneuriev@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Eugene Uriev <eugeneuriev@gmail.com>
|
|
This changes are probable worth to be generalized in a
separate .h-file so, making it able to cover
libc-mallocs and others, without too much copy-paste.
But the malloc<=>mALLOc substitutions interfere
with an elegant way to do this.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Uriev <eugeneuriev@gmail.com>
|
|
These fast helpers sometimes breach mem-chunk boundaries.
Thus they trigger mcheck alarm. Standard ones are accurate though.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Uriev <eugeneuriev@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Eugene Uriev <eugeneuriev@gmail.com>
|
|
dlmalloc has some sanity checks it performs on free() which can help detect
memory corruption. However, they are only enabled if DEBUG is defined before
including common.h. Define DEBUG earlier if UNIT_TEST is enabled so that
assertions are enabled in sandbox.
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the
malloc pool exists.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
The last user of the NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC has been removed in commit
26af162ac8f8 ("arch: m68k: Implement relocation")
Remove now unused NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC code.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
|
|
To support SPL_SYS_MALLOC_CLEAR_ON_INIT, we have to modify
#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_CLEAR_ON_INIT
to #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SYS_MALLOC_CLEAR_ON_INIT)
Signed-off-by: Bo Gan <ganboing@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shengyu Qu <wiagn233@outlook.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
With clang-15 we now will get warnings such as:
warning: a function declaration without a prototype is deprecated in all
versions of C [-Wstrict-prototypes]
And it is easy enough to address this warning here, as we aren't
concerned with re-syncing with an upstream.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
It is helpful to test that out-of-memory checks work correctly in code
that calls malloc().
Add a simple way to force failure after a given number of malloc() calls.
Fix a header guard to avoid a build error on sandbox_vpl.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
|
|
This annotates malloc and friends so that valgrind can track the heap. To
do this, we need to follow a few rules:
* Call VALGRIND_MALLOCLIKE_BLOCK whenever we malloc something
* Call VALGRIND_FREELIKE_BLOCK whenever we free something (generally after
we have done our bookkeeping)
* Call VALGRIND_RESIZEINPLACE_BLOCK whenever we change the size of an
allocation. We don't record the original request size of a block, and
neither does valgrind. For this reason, we pretend that the old size of
the allocation was for 0 bytes. This marks the whole allocaton as
undefined, so in order to mark all bits correctly, we must make the whole
new allocation defined with VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_DEFINED. This may cause us
to miss some invalid reads, but there is no way to detect these without
recording the original size of the allocation.
In addition to the above, dlmalloc itself tends to make a lot of accesses
which we know are safe, but which would be unsafe outside of dlmalloc. For
this reason, we provide a suppression file which ignores errors ocurring in
dlmalloc.c
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
The original code is in the public domain. Licenses/README states that the
general license for U-Boot is GPL 2.0+. So we can mark the malloc code as
GPL 2.0+ too.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
|
Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In
a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding
another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header
files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few
cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so
remove that include.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Move this header out of the common header.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
times
Malloc gets initialized with a call to mem_malloc_init() with the address
the allocation starts to and its size. Currently it is not possible to
move the malloc from one memory area to another as the malloc would eventually
fail.
This patch adds in the ability to re-init the malloc with the updated
start address and the size.
One of the use cases of this feature is SPL U-Boot running from within
the static memory and calling to malloc init from within board_init_f():
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S:reset vector
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S:main()
arch/arm/lib/crt0_64.S:board_init_f()
board/<my_board>/common/spl.c:board_init_f()
board/<my_board>/common/spl.c:mem_malloc_init((ulong)CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_START,
CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_SIZE);
Shortly after the DDR (main) memory is init and ready we call to malloc init
again but this time with the start address in the DDR memory and a much greater
size for moving the allocation off the static to the DDR memory:
board/<my_board>/common/spl.c:mem_malloc_init((ulong)CONFIG_SPL_MALLOC_OFFSET,
CONFIG_SPL_MALLOC_SIZE);
Where CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_START and CONFIG_SPL_MALLOC_OFFSET are the start
addresses of the malloc in the static and DDR memories respectively and
CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_SIZE=SZ_16K and CONFIG_SPL_MALLOC_SIZE=SZ_2M are
the sizes of the mallocs in these memories. Note, now we have a much greater
memory, enlarging from 16K to 2M, available for allocation.
There is an alternative approach already existing in U-Boot with the use of
an early (simplified) malloc and the proper (dlamalloc) malloc however
necessitating managing the two mallocs whereas this approach proposes using
a single dlmalloc.
Signed-off-by: Marek Bykowski <marek.bykowski@gmail.com>
|
|
We cannot run unit tests in SPL. So remove the unit test support.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
|
When full malloc is enabled and SYS_MALLOC_F is also enabled, the simple
pre-reloc heap is used before relocation. In this case, calloc() uses
the MALLOC_ZERO macro to zero out the allocated memory. However, since
this macro is specially crafted for the dlmalloc implementation, it
does not always work for simple malloc.
For example, when allocating 16 bytes via simple malloc, only the first
12 bytes get zeroed out. The last 4 bytes will remain untouched.
This is a problem for DM drivers that are allocated before relocation:
memory allocated via 'platdata_auto_alloc_size' might not be set to
zero, resulting in bogus behaviour.
To fix this, use 'memset' instead of 'MALLOC_ZERO' to zero out memory
that compes from simple malloc.
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
When using memalign() in a scenario where U-Boot is configured for full
malloc support with simple malloc not explicitly enabled and before the
full malloc support is initialized, a memory block is being allocated
and returned without the alignment parameter getting honored.
Fix this issue by replacing the existing memalign pre-full malloc init
logic with a call to memalign_simple() this way ensuring proper alignment
of the returned memory block.
Fixes: ee038c58d519 ("malloc: Use malloc simple before malloc is fully initialized in memalign()")
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
|
|
Follow implementation in mALLOc(). Check GD_FLG_FULL_MALLOC_INIT flag and use
malloc_simple if GD_FLG_FULL_MALLOC_INIT is unset. Adjust the malloc bytes
to align with the requested alignment.
The original memalign() function will access mchunkptr struct to adjust the
alignment if there is misalignment happen, but mchunkptr struct is not being
initialized before full malloc is initialized. This cause the system crash.
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
|
|
0 is not a pointer. So do not compare pointers to 0.
Do not return 0 from functions with a pointer return
type.
Problem identified with Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
|
Some platforms have very limited SRAM to run SPL code, so there may
not be the same amount space for a malloc pool before relocation in
the SPL stage as the normal U-Boot stage.
Make SPL and (the full) U-Boot stage use independent SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN,
so the size of pre-relocation malloc pool can be configured memory
space independently.
Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Acked-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
[fixed up commit-message:]
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
|
|
Unit tests require mallinfo which in turn requires DEBUG on
dlmalloc to be enabled.
The dependancy on CONFIG_SANDBOX is wrong.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Commit 4f144a416469 "malloc: work around some memalign fragmentation
issues" enhanced memalign() so that it can succeed in more cases where
heap fragmentation is present. However, it did not solve as many cases
as it could. This patch enhances the code to cover more cases.
The alignment code works by allocating more space than the user requests,
then adjusting the returned pointer to achieve alignment. In general, one
must allocate "alignment" bytes more than the user requested in order to
guarantee that alignment is possible. This is what the original code does.
The previous enhancement attempted a second allocation if the padded
allocation failed, and succeeded if that allocation just happened to be
aligned; a fluke that happened often in practice. There are still cases
where this could fail, yet where it is still possible to honor the user's
allocation request. In particular, if the heap contains a free region that
is large enough for the user's request, and for leading padding to ensure
alignment, but has no or little space for any trailing padding. In this
case, we can make a third(!) allocation attempt after calculating exactly
the size of the leading padding required to achieve alignment, which is
the minimal over-allocation needed for the overall memalign() operation to
succeed if the third and second allocations end up at the same location.
This patch isn't checkpatch-clean, since it conforms to the existing
coding style in dlmalloc.c, which is different to the rest of U-Boot.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Remove several hundred lines of content surrounded by:
#if 0 /* Moved to malloc.h */
... moved stuff ...
#endif /* 0 */ /* Moved to malloc.h */
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Following the previous patch, malloc() is never called before gd is set,
so we can remove the special-case check for this condition.
This reverts commit 854d2b9753e4 "dlmalloc: ensure gd is set for early
alloc".
Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
The recent change to memalign() caused the allocation failure detection
code to be dead code; the "retry" logic is always activated under the same
condition that the original failure detection code is, and also fully
handles any possible failures. This patch solves the presence of dead
code.
Two alternatives are possible:
a) Delete the now-dead test, and rely on the "retry" path to handle any
allocation problems, as it does.
b) Make the "retry" path fall through to the existing (currently dead)
failure detection code, thus making it not-dead.
(b) was chosen since it reduces the diff between U-Boot's and the upstream
dlmalloc. This should make it marginally easier to import a new version of
dlmalloc in the future.
Reported by: Coverity Scan
Fixes: 4f144a416469 ("malloc: work around some memalign fragmentation issues")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Use of memalign can trigger fragmentation issues such as:
// Internally, this needs to find a free block quite bit larger than s.
// Once the free region is found, any unaligned "padding" immediately
// before and after the block is marked free, so that the allocation
// takes only s bytes (plus malloc header overhead).
p = memalign(a, s);
// If there's little fragmentation so far, this allocation is likely
// located immediately after p.
p2 = malloc(x);
free(p);
// In theory, this should return the same value for p. However, the hole
// left by the free() call is only s in size (plus malloc header overhead)
// whereas memalign searches for a larger block in order to guarantee it
// can adjust the returned pointer to the alignment requirements. Hence,
// the pointer returned, if any, won't be p. If there's little or no space
// left after p2, this allocation will fail.
p = memalign(a, s);
In practice, this issue occurs when running the "dfu" command repeatedly
on NVIDIA Tegra boards, since DFU allocates a large 32M data buffer, and
then initializes the USB controller. If this is the first time USB has
been used in the U-Boot session, this causes a probe of the USB driver,
which causes various allocations, including a strdup() of a GPIO name
when requesting the VBUS GPIO. When DFU is torn down, the USB driver
is left probed, and hence its memory is left allocated. If "dfu" is
executed again, allocation of the 32M data buffer fails as described
above.
In practice, there is a memory hole exactly large enough to hold the 32M
data buffer than DFU needs. However, memalign() can't know that in a
general way. Given that, it's particularly annoying that the allocation
fails!
The issue is that memalign() tries to allocate something larger to
guarantee the ability to align the returned pointer. This patch modifies
memalign() so that if the "general case" over-sized allocation fails,
another allocation is attempted, of the exact size the user desired. If
that allocation just happens to be aligned in the way the user wants,
(and in the case described above, it will be, since the free memory
region is located where a previous identical allocation was located),
the pointer can be returned.
This patch is somewhat related to 806bd245b1ab "dfu: don't keep
freeing/reallocating". That patch worked around the issue by removing
repeated free/memalign within a single execution of "dfu". However,
the same technique can't be applied across multiple invocations, since
there's no reason to keep the DFU buffer allocated while DFU isn't
running. This patch addresses the root-cause a bit more directly.
This problem highlights some of the disadvantages of dynamic allocation
and deferred probing of devices.
This patch isn't checkpatch-clean, since it conforms to the existing
coding style in dlmalloc.c, which is different to the rest of U-Boot.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
|
|
To allow this function to be used from SPL, move it to the malloc()
code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
This commit introduces new config: CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_CLEAR_ON_INIT.
This config is an expert option and is enabled by default.
The all amount of memory reserved for the malloc, is by default set
to zero in mem_malloc_init(). When the malloc reserved memory exceeds
few MiB, then the boot process can slow down.
So disabling this config, is an expert option to reduce the boot time,
and can be disabled by Kconfig.
Note:
After disable this option, only calloc() will return the pointer
to the zeroed memory area. Previously, without this option,
the memory pointed to untouched malloc memory region, was filled
with zeros. So it means, that code with malloc() calls should
be reexamined.
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
The simple malloc() implementation is used when memory is tight. It provides
a simple buffer with an incrementing pointer.
At present the implementation is inside dlmalloc. Move it into its own file
so that it is easier to find.
Rather than using relocation as a signal that the full malloc() is
available, add a special GD_FLG_FULL_MALLOC_INIT flag. This signals that the
simple malloc() should no longer be used.
In some cases, such as SPL, even the code space used by the full malloc() is
wasteful. Add a CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE option to provide only the simple
malloc. In this case the full malloc is not available at all. It saves about
1KB of code space and about 0.5KB of data on Thumb 2.
Acked-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
When DEBUG is set, output memory region used for malloc().
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Attempting to run the sandbox leads to a segfault, because some dynamic
libraries (outside of u-boot) attempt to use malloc() to allocate memory
before u-boot's gd variable is initialized.
Check for gd not being NULL in the SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN handling, so that
malloc() doesn't crash when called at this point.
$ gdb -q --args ./u-boot
(gdb) r
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0000000000412b9b in malloc (bytes=bytes@entry=37) at common/dlmalloc.c:2184
2184 if (!(gd->flags & GD_FLG_RELOC)) {
(gdb) p gd
$1 = (gd_t *) 0x0
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0000000000412b9b in malloc (bytes=bytes@entry=37) at common/dlmalloc.c:2184
#1 0x00007ffff75bf8e1 in set_binding_values (domainname=0x7ffff11f4f12 "libgpg-error", dirnamep=0x7fffffffe168, codesetp=0x0)
at bindtextdom.c:228
#2 0x00007ffff75bfb4c in set_binding_values (codesetp=0x0, dirnamep=0x7fffffffe168, domainname=<optimized out>) at bindtextdom.c:350
#3 __bindtextdomain (domainname=<optimized out>, dirname=0x7ffff11f4f00 "/usr/share/locale") at bindtextdom.c:348
#4 0x00007ffff11eca17 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgpg-error.so.0
#5 0x00007ffff7dea9fa in call_init (l=<optimized out>, argc=argc@entry=1, argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffe208,
env=env@entry=0x7fffffffe218) at dl-init.c:78
#6 0x00007ffff7deaae3 in call_init (env=0x7fffffffe218, argv=0x7fffffffe208, argc=1, l=<optimized out>) at dl-init.c:36
#7 _dl_init (main_map=0x7ffff7ffe1a8, argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe208, env=0x7fffffffe218) at dl-init.c:126
#8 0x00007ffff7ddd1ca in _dl_start_user () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Tun on DEBUG in malloc(). This adds code space and slows things down but
for sandbox this is acceptable. We gain the ability to check for memory
leaks in tests.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
If we are to have driver model before relocation we need to support some
way of calling memory allocation routines.
The standard malloc() is pretty complicated:
1. It uses some BSS memory for its state, and BSS is not available before
relocation
2. It supports algorithms for reducing memory fragmentation and improving
performace of free(). Before relocation we could happily just not support
free().
3. It includes about 4KB of code (Thumb 2) and 1KB of data. However since
this has been loaded anyway this is not really a problem.
The simplest way to support pre-relocation malloc() is to reserve an area
of memory and allocate it in increasing blocks as needed. This
implementation does this.
To enable it, you need to define the size of the malloc() pool as described
in the README. It will be located above the pre-relocation stack on
supported architectures.
Note that this implementation is only useful on machines which have some
memory available before dram_init() is called - this includes those that
do no DRAM init (like tegra) and those that do it in SPL (quite a few
boards). Enabling driver model preior to relocation for the rest of the
boards is left for a later exercise.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
These don't really serve any purpose in the modern age. On the other hand
they show up as annoying control characters in my editor, which then happily
removes them.
I believe we can drop these characters from the file.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
'bool' is defined in random places. This patch consolidates them into a
single header file include/linux/types.h, using stdbool.h introduced in C99.
All other #define, typedef and enum are removed. They are all consistent with
true = 1, false = 0.
Replace FALSE, False with false. Replace TRUE, True with true.
Skip *.py, *.php, lib/* files.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
|
|
On architectures where manual relocation
is needed, the 'malloc_bin_reloc' function
must be called after 'mem_malloc_init'.
Make the 'malloc_bin_reloc' function static
and call it directly from 'mem_malloc_init'
instead of calling that from board_init_{r,f}
functions of the affected architectures.
Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Jin <Jason.jin@freescale.com>
Cc: Macpaul Lin <macpaul@andestech.com>
Cc: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@gaisler.com>
Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@googlemail.com>
|
|
command.c:44:38: error: bad constant expression
dlmalloc.c:1468:2: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:1468:5: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2176:12: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2179:31: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2382:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2436:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2582:31: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2585:17: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2646:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2659:19: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2692:19: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2707:19: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2708:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2786:31: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2801:12: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2801:22: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2926:27: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2928:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:2929:12: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
dlmalloc.c:3075:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
hush.c:292:14: warning: symbol 'last_return_code' was not declared. Should it be static?
hush.c:293:5: warning: symbol 'nesting_level' was not declared. Should it be static?
hush.c:2175:20: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
hush.c:2175:34: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
hush.c:2210:41: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
hush.c:2216:45: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
hush.c:2249:25: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
hush.c:2332:13: warning: symbol 'new_pipe' was not declared. Should it be static?
hush.c:2390:5: warning: symbol 'reserved_word' was not declared. Should it be static?
hush.c:2927:5: warning: symbol 'parse_stream' was not declared. Should it be static?
hush.c:3127:6: warning: symbol 'mapset' was not declared. Should it be static?
hush.c:3133:6: warning: symbol 'update_ifs_map' was not declared. Should it be static?
hush.c:3161:5: warning: symbol 'parse_stream_outer' was not declared. Should it be static?
hush.c:3295:34: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
hush.c:3631:5: warning: symbol 'do_showvar' was not declared. Should it be static
image.c:1282:29: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
image.c:1315:41: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
image.c:1330:25: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
image.c:1706:25: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
main.c:510:10: warning: symbol 'hist_num' was not declared. Should it be static?
main.c:512:5: warning: symbol 'hist_list' was not declared. Should it be static?
main.c:513:6: warning: symbol 'hist_lines' was not declared. Should it be static?
usb_storage.c:195:6: warning: symbol 'usb_show_progress' was not declared. Should it be static?
usb_storage.c:440:48: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
usb_storage.c:503:5: warning: symbol 'usb_stor_BBB_comdat' was not declared. Should it be static?
usb_storage.c:551:5: warning: symbol 'usb_stor_CB_comdat' was not declared. Should it be static?
usb_storage.c:629:55: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
usb_storage.c:620:5: warning: symbol 'usb_stor_CBI_get_status' was not declared. Should it be static?
usb_storage.c:675:43: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
usb_storage.c:668:5: warning: symbol 'usb_stor_BBB_clear_endpt_stall' was not declared. Should it be static?
usb_storage.c:679:5: warning: symbol 'usb_stor_BBB_transport' was not declared. Should it be static?
usb_storage.c:801:5: warning: symbol 'usb_stor_CB_transport' was not declared. Sh
xyzModem.c:104:1: warning: symbol 'CYGACC_COMM_IF_GETC_TIMEOUT' was not declared. Should it be static?
xyzModem.c:122:1: warning: symbol 'CYGACC_COMM_IF_PUTC' was not declared. Should it be static?
xyzModem.c:169:1: warning: symbol 'parse_num' was not declared. Should it be stat
note: hush.c's nesting_level deleted because not used.
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
|
|
This fixes the following warnings in dlmalloc seen with my gcc 4.6.
dlmalloc.c: In function 'malloc_bin_reloc':
dlmalloc.c:1493: warning: dereferencing pointer 'p' does break strict-aliasing rules
dlmalloc.c:1493: warning: dereferencing pointer 'p' does break strict-aliasing rules
dlmalloc.c:1490: note: initialized from here
dlmalloc.c:1493: note: initialized from here
This version is tested on avr32 arch boards.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
|
