| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Now that this functionality is modeled using the device tree and
regulator uclass, the named GPIO is not referenced anywhere. Remove
it, along with the rest of the support for AXP virtual GPIOs.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
|
|
As part of bringing the master branch back in to next, we need to allow
for all of these changes to exist here.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Remove <common.h> from this driver directory and when needed
add missing include files directly.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
U-Boot's generic GPIO_EXTRA_HEADER is a convenience symbol to allow code
to more easily include platform specific GPIO headers. This should not
be needed in a DM world anymore, since the generic GPIO framework
handles that nicely.
For Allwinner boards we still need to deal with non-DM GPIO in the SPL,
but this should become the exception, not the rule.
Make this more obvious by removing the definition of GPIO_EXTRA_HEADER,
and just force every legacy user of platform specific GPIO to include
the new sunxi_gpio.h header explicitly. Everyone doing so should feel
ashamed and should find a way to avoid it from now on.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Tested-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
|
|
Now that this functionality is modeled using the device tree and
regulator uclass, the named GPIO is not referenced anywhere. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
|
|
As part of migrating to DM_GPIO and DM_PINCTRL, eventually we will
remove the asm/arch/gpio.h header. In preparation, clean up the various
files that include it.
Some files did not contain any GPIO code at all, so this header was
completely unused.
A few files contained only legacy platform-specific GPIO code for
setting up pin muxes. They were left unchanged, as that code will be
completely removed by the DM_PINCTRL migration.
The remaining files contain some combination of DM_GPIO and legacy GPIO
code. For those, switch to including asm/gpio.h (if it wasn't included
already). Right now, this header provides both sets of functions,
because ARCH_SUNXI selects GPIO_EXTRA_HEADER. This will still be the
right header to include once the DM_GPIO migration is complete and
GPIO_EXTRA_HEADER is no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
VBUS drive is supported on AXP221 and later PMICs. Rework the macros
so we can support this on later PMICs without too much work.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
|
|
Stop prefixing the axp functions for setting voltages, etc. with the
model number, there ever is only one pmic driver built into u-boot,
this allows simplifying the callers.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
|
|
Now that all sunxi boards are using driver-model for gpio (*), we can remove
the non driver-model support from the axp gpio code, and the glue to call
into the axp gpio code from the sunxi_gpio non driver-model code.
*) For the regular u-boot build, SPL still uses non driver-model gpio for
now, but the SPL never uses axp gpios support and we were already not building
axp-gpio support for the SPL.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
|
|
Add driver-model support to the axp_gpio code, note that this needs a small
tweak to the driver-model version of sunxi_name_to_gpio to deal with the
vbus detect and enable pins which are not standard numbered gpios.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
|
|
Move the axp-gpio code out of the drivers/power/axp*.c code, and into
a new separate axpi-gpio driver.
This change drops supports for the gpio3 pin on the axp209, as that requires
special handling, and no boards are using it.
Besides cleaning things up by moving the code to a separate driver, as
a bonus this change also adds support for the (non vusb) gpio pins on the
axp221 and the gpio pins on the axp152.
The new axp-gpio driver gets its own Kconfig option, and is only enabled
on boards which need it. Besides that it only gets enabled in the regular
u-boot build and not for the SPL as we never need it in the SPL.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
|
