| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
There are platforms which set the value of ram_top based on certain
restrictions that the platform might have in accessing memory above
ram_top, even when the memory region is in the same DRAM bank. So,
even though the LMB allocator works as expected, when trying to
allocate memory above ram_top, prohibit this by marking all memory
above ram_top as reserved, even if the said memory region is from the
same bank.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
|
|
At the moment the LMB allocator will return 'success' immediately on two
consecutive allocations if the second one is smaller and the flags match
without resizing the reserved area.
This is problematic for two reasons, first of all the new updated
allocation won't update the size and we end up holding more memory than
needed, but most importantly it breaks the EFI SCT tests since EFI
now allocates via LMB.
More specifically when EFI requests a specific address twice with the
EFI_ALLOCATE_ADDRESS flag set, the first allocation will succeed and
update the EFI memory map. Due to the LMB behavior the second allocation
will also succeed but the address ranges are already in the EFI memory
map due the first allocation. EFI will then fail to update the memory map,
returning EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES instead of EFI_NOT_FOUND which break EFI
conformance.
So let's remove the fast check with is problematic anyway and leave LMB
resize and calculate address properly. LMB will now
- try to resize the reservations for LMB_NONE
- return -1 if the memory is not LMB_NONE and already reserved
The LMB code needs some cleanup in that part, but since we are close to
2025.01 do the easy fix and plan to refactor it later.
Also update the dm tests with the new behavior.
Fixes: commit 22f2c9ed9f53 ("efi: memory: use the lmb API's for allocating and freeing memory")
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
In the message string " %s[%d]\t[0x%llx-0x%llx], 0x%08llx bytes flags: "
a comma is missing before flags.
To avoid increasing the code size replace '0x%' by '%#'.
Printing the size with leading zeros but not the addresses does not really
make sense. Remove the leading zeros from the size output.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
[trini: Fix test/cmd/bdinfo.c for these changes]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Commit c3cf0dc64f1c ("lmb: add a check to prevent memory overrun")
addressed a possible buffer overrun using assert_noisy().
Resetting via panic() in lmb_print_region() while allowing invalid
lmb flags elsewhere is not reasonable.
Instead of panicking print a message indicating the problem.
fls() returns an int. Using a u64 for bitpos does not match.
Use int instead.
fls() takes an int as argument. Using 1ull << bitpos generates a u64.
Use 1u << bitpos instead.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
|
|
These functions can be used with struct lmb pointers and will be used to
manage IOVA space in the apple_dart iommu driver. This restores part of
the pointer base struct lmb API from before commit ed17a33fed29 ("lmb:
make LMB memory map persistent and global").
io_lmb_add() and io_lmb_free() can trivially reuse exisiting lmb
functions. io_lmb_setup() is separate for unique error log messages.
io_lmb_alloc() is a simplified copy of _lmb_alloc_base() since the
later has unused features and internal use of the global LMB memory map.
Signed-off-by: Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>
|
|
Low lovel LMB functionality will be used to manage IOVA space in the
Apple dart iommu driver. This reordering ensures that those function
can not access the global LMB memory map variable.
Signed-off-by: Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>
|
|
It will be re-used with a lmb list pointer as argument for IOVA
allocations in the apple_dart iommu driver.
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>
|
|
There is already a defined stack-size which is used to reserve space for
the stack. It is confusing to add more in the lmb module, since then the
memory map (with meminfo command) seems to have a hole in it.
Drop this unnecessary feature.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Function lmb_map_update_notify() is always referenced.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
We never unmap the memory used to update the EFI memory map after
notifications
Fixes: commit 2f6191526a13 ("lmb: notify of any changes to the LMB memory map")
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
|
lmb_alloc_flags() & lmb_alloc_base_flags() are just a wrappers for
_lmb_alloc_base(). Since the only difference is the max address of the
allowed allocation which _lmb_alloc_base() already supports with the
LMB_ALLOC_ANYWHERE flag, remove one of them.
Keep the lmb_alloc_base_flags() which also prints an error on failures
and adjust efi_allocate_pages() to only use one of them.
While at it clean up the duplicate function description from the header
file.
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
We never call lmb_map_update_notify() without checking the result of
lmb_should_notify(). Instead of running that function everytime fold it
in there and add the additional flags parameter
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
The function description says this should return 0 or -1 on failures.
When regions coalesce though this returns the number of coalescedregions
which is confusing and requires special handling of the return code.
On top of that no one is using the number of coalesced regions.
So let's just return 0 on success and adjust our selftests accordingly
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@linaro.org>
|
|
When printing the LMB flags for a memory region, there is a need to
check that the array index that is computed is a sane value. Put a
noisy assert in case this check fails, as that implies something with
the LMB code is not working as expected.
Reported-by: Coverity (CID 510463)
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
|
|
Provide a way to access this data structure so that the meminfo command
can use it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
lmb_add_region() returns a positive integer if the added regions causes
existing regions to be coalesced. We still want to notify the EFI
subsystem about these added regions though, so adjust lmb_add() to only
bail on errors.
This fixes EFI memory allocation on boards with adjacent memory banks as is the
case on several Qualcomm boards like the RB3 Gen 2.
Fixes: 2f6191526a13 (lmb: notify of any changes to the LMB memory map)
Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
A bunch of static functions in the LMB module have used a
double-undersore for the function names. It was suggested to use a
single-underscore instead, as the double-underscore is usually used
by library functions. Replace the double-underscore with
single-underscore for all functions.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Suggested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
The EFI memory allocations are now being done through the LMB
module. With this change, there is no need to get the EFI memory map
and set aside EFI allocated memory.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Some architectures have special or unique aspects which need
consideration when adding memory ranges to the list of available
memory map. Enable this config in such scenarios which allow
architectures and boards to define their own memory map.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
|
|
In U-Boot, LMB and EFI are two primary modules who provide memory
allocation and reservation API's. Both these modules operate with the
same regions of memory for allocations. Use the LMB memory map update
event to notify other interested listeners about a change in it's
memory map. This can then be used by the other module to keep track of
available and used memory.
There is no need to send these notifications when the LMB module is
being unit-tested. Add a flag to the lmb structure to indicate if the
memory map is being used for tests, and suppress sending any
notifications when running these unit tests.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
|
|
U-Boot does not use memory above ram_top. However, this memory does
need to get registered as part of the memory map, so that subsystems
like EFI pass it on to the operating system as part of the EFI memory
map. Add memory above ram_top and reserve it with the LMB_NOOVERWRITE
flag so that it does not get allocated or re-used.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Suggested-by: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@openbsd.org>
|
|
Add a flag LMB_NONOTIFY that can be passed to the LMB API's for
reserving memory. This will then result in no notification being sent
from the LMB module for the changes to the LMB's memory map.
While here, also add a description of the memory attributes that the
flags signify.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
|
|
The LMB module is to be used as a backend for allocating and freeing
up memory requested from other modules like EFI. These memory requests
are different from the typical LMB reservations in that memory
required by the EFI module cannot be overwritten, or re-requested. Add
versions of the LMB API functions with flags for allocating and
freeing up memory. The caller can then use these API's for specifying
the type of memory that is required. For now, these functions will be
used by the EFI memory module.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Rename this function to indicate that it refers to any xPL phase.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Instead of printing the LMB flags as numerical values, print them as
strings. This makes it easier to understand what flags are associated
with the lmb region. Also make corresponding changes to the bdinfo
command's test code.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
The board_lmb_reserve() function is not being used, and currently
there is only an empty weak function defined. Remove this unused
function.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
All of the current definitions of arch_lmb_reserve() are doing the
same thing -- reserve the region of memory occupied by U-Boot,
starting from the current stack address to the ram_top. Introduce a
function lmb_reserve_uboot_region() which does this, and do away with
the arch_lmb_reserve() function.
Instead of using the current value of stack pointer for starting the
reserved region, have a fixed value, considering the stack size config
value.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
With the move to make the LMB allocations persistent and the common
memory regions being reserved during board init, there is no need for
an explicit reservation of a memory range. Remove the
lmb_init_and_reserve_range() function.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
With the changes to make the LMB reservations persistent, the common
memory regions are being added during board init. Remove the
now superfluous lmb_init_and_reserve() function.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
The LMB module provides API's for allocating and reserving chunks of
memory which is then typically used for things like loading images for
booting. Reserve the portion of memory that is occupied by the U-Boot
image itself, and other parts of memory that might have been marked as
reserved in the board's DTB. When executing in SPL, reserve the
sections that get relocated to the ram memory, the stack and
the global data structure and also the bss.
Mark these regions of memory with the LMB_NOOVERWRITE flag to indicate
that these regions cannot be re-requested or overwritten.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Introduce a function lmb_add_memory() to add available memory to the
LMB memory map. Call this function during board init once the LMB data
structures have been initialised.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Allow for resizing of LMB regions if the region attributes match. The
current code returns a failure status on detecting an overlapping
address. This worked up until now since the LMB calls were not
persistent and global -- the LMB memory map was specific and private
to a given caller of the LMB API's.
With the change in the LMB code to make the LMB reservations
persistent, there needs to be a check on whether the memory region can
be resized, and then do it if so. To distinguish between memory that
cannot be resized, add a new flag, LMB_NOOVERWRITE. Reserving a region
of memory with this attribute would indicate that the region cannot be
resized.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
|
|
The current LMB API's for allocating and reserving memory use a
per-caller based memory view. Memory allocated by a caller can then be
overwritten by another caller. Make these allocations and reservations
persistent using the alloced list data structure.
Two alloced lists are declared -- one for the available(free) memory,
and one for the used memory. Once full, the list can then be extended
at runtime.
[sjg: Use a stack to store pointer of lmb struct when running lmb tests]
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[sjg: Optimise the logic to add a region in lmb_add_region_flags()]
|
|
The __lmb_alloc_base() function is only called from within the lmb
module. Moreover, the lmb_alloc() and lmb_alloc_base() API's are good
enough for the allocation API calls. Make the __lmb_alloc_base()
function static.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
The lmb_is_reserved() API is not used. There is another API,
lmb_is_reserved_flags() which can be used to check if a particular
memory region is reserved. Remove the unused API.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
After some header file cleanups to add missing include files, remove
common.h from all files in the lib directory. This primarily means just
dropping the line but in a few cases we need to add in other header
files now.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
In case of new memory range to be added is coalesced
with any already added non last lmb region.
And there is possibility that, then region in which new memory
range added is not adjacent to next region. But have some
sections are overlapping.
So along with adjacency check with next lmb region,
check for overlap should be done.
In case overlap is found, adjust and merge these two lmb
region into one.
Reported-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
|
|
Add the max number of region in lmb dump; this patch allows to
check the limit for usage of the LMB regions, memory or reserved.
Result on STM32MP157C-DK2:
STM32MP> bdinfo
.....
lmb_dump_all:
memory.cnt = 0x1 / max = 0x2
memory[0] [0xc0000000-0xdfffffff], 0x20000000 bytes flags: 0
reserved.cnt = 0x6 / max = 0x10
reserved[0] [0x10000000-0x10045fff], 0x00046000 bytes flags: 4
reserved[1] [0x30000000-0x3003ffff], 0x00040000 bytes flags: 4
reserved[2] [0x38000000-0x3800ffff], 0x00010000 bytes flags: 4
reserved[3] [0xd4000000-0xd7ffffff], 0x04000000 bytes flags: 4
reserved[4] [0xdcae5000-0xdfffffff], 0x0351b000 bytes flags: 0
reserved[5] [0xddafb5b8-0xdfffffff], 0x02504a48 bytes flags: 0
....
Reported-by: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
|
|
Remove test on CONFIG_LMB_MEMORY_REGIONS introduced by commit
7c1860fce4e3 ("lmb: Fix lmb property's defination under struct lmb").
This code in lmb_init() is strange, because if CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS
and CONFIG_LMB_MEMORY_REGIONS are not defined, the implicit #else is empty
and the required initialization is not done:
lmb->memory.max = ?
lmb->reserved.max = ?
But this setting is not possible:
- CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS not defined
- CONFIG_LMB_MEMORY_REGIONS not defined
because CONFIG_LMB_MEMORY_REGIONS and CONFIG_LMB_RESERVED_REGIONS are
defined as soon as the CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS is not defined.
This patch removes this impossible case #elif and I add some
explanation in lmb.h to explain why in the struct lmb {} the lmb
property is defined if CONFIG_LMB_MEMORY_REGIONS is NOT defined.
This patch also removes CONFIG_LMB_XXX dependency on CONFIG_LMB as these
defines are used in API file lmb.h and not only in library file.
Fixes: 5e2548c1d6e03 ("lmb: Fix LMB_MEMORY_REGIONS flag usage")
Reported-by: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
|
|
In various cases logical memory blocks are coalesced; As a result doing
a strict check whether memory blocks are the same doesn't necessarily
work as a previous addition of a given block might have been merged into
a bigger block.
Fix this by considering a block is already registered if it's a pure
subset of one of the existing blocks.
Signed-off-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@collabora.com>
|
|
When adding reserved memory areas from the EFI memory map set the NOMAP
flag when applicable. When this isn't done adding "no-map" flagged entries
from the fdt after receiving the same from the EFI memory map fails due
to non-matching flags.
Signed-off-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@collabora.com>
|
|
Add reservations for all EFI memory areas that are not
EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
|
This patch is fixing a broken boot observed on stm32mp157c-dk2 board.
IS_ENABLED macro should be used to check if a compilation flag is set
to "y" or "m".
LMB_MEMORY_REGIONS is set to a numerical value, IS_ENABLED macro is not
suitable in this case.
Fixes: 7c1860fce4e3 ("lmb: Fix lmb property's defination under struct lmb")
Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Under struct lmb {} the lmb property's should be defined only if
CONFIG_LMB_MEMORY_REGIONS is defined.
Signed-off-by: Ashok Reddy Soma <ashok.reddy.soma@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c24a2b1d6f5db4eb65393f6a77fae129b30b6233.1657183534.git.michal.simek@amd.com
|
|
In case U-Boot starts with GD_FLG_SKIP_RELOC, the U-Boot code is
not relocated, however the stack and heap is at the end of DRAM
after relocation. Reserve a LMB area for the non-relocated U-Boot
code so it won't be overwritten.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Add a host Kconfig for OF_LIBFDT. With this we can use
CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_LIBFDT) directly in the tools build, so drop the
unnecessary indirection.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
The arc/arm/m68k/microblaze/mips/ppc arch_lmb_reserve() implementations
are all mostly the same, except for a couple of details. Implement a
generic arch_lmb_reserve_generic() function which can be parametrized
enough to cater for those differences between architectures. This can
also be parametrized enough so it can handle cases where U-Boot is not
relocated to the end of DRAM e.g. because there is some other reserved
memory past U-Boot (e.g. unmovable firmware for coprocessor), it is not
relocated at all, and other such use cases.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com>
Cc: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@sysam.it>
Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
Cc: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>
Cc: Hai Pham <hai.pham.ud@renesas.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Add lmb_dump_region() function, to simplify lmb_dump_all_force().
This patch is based on Linux memblock dump function.
An example of bdinfo output is:
.....
fdt_size = 0x000146a0
FB base = 0xfdd00000
lmb_dump_all:
memory.cnt = 0x1
memory[0] [0xc0000000-0xffffffff], 0x40000000 bytes flags: 0
reserved.cnt = 0x6
reserved[0] [0x10000000-0x10045fff], 0x00046000 bytes flags: 4
reserved[1] [0x30000000-0x3003ffff], 0x00040000 bytes flags: 4
reserved[2] [0x38000000-0x3800ffff], 0x00010000 bytes flags: 4
reserved[3] [0xe8000000-0xefffffff], 0x08000000 bytes flags: 4
reserved[4] [0xfbaea344-0xfdffffff], 0x02515cbc bytes flags: 0
reserved[5] [0xfe000000-0xffffffff], 0x02000000 bytes flags: 4
arch_number = 0x00000000
TLB addr = 0xfdff0000
....
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Add a new function lmb_is_reserved_flags to check if
an address is reserved with a specific flags.
This function can be used to check if an address was
reserved with no-map flags with:
lmb_is_reserved_flags(lmb, addr, LMB_NOMAP);
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
|
|
Add "flags" in lmb_property to save the "no-map" property of
reserved region and a new function lmb_reserve_flags() to check
this flag.
The default allocation use flags = LMB_NONE.
The adjacent reserved memory region are merged only when they have
the same flags value.
This patch is partially based on flags support done in Linux kernel
mm/memblock .c (previously lmb.c); it is why LMB_NOMAP = 0x4, it is
aligned with MEMBLOCK_NOMAP value.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
