| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add gpio pins generic test for the set of gpio pin list to test various
gpio related functionality, such as the input, set, clear, and toggle,
it also tests the input and output functionality for shorted gpio pins.
This test depends on boardenv* configuration to define gpio pins names.
Signed-off-by: Love Kumar <love.kumar@amd.com>
|
|
This assumes that the GPIO starts as 0 but it does not if
test_gpio_input() ran first and test_gpio_exit_statuses() was skipped.
This can happen when running tests in parallel.
Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
As explained in commit 4af2a33ee5b9 ("cmd: gpio: Make `gpio input`
return pin value again") the `gpio input` is used in scripts to obtain
the value of a pin, despite the fact that CMD_RET_FAILURE is
indistinguishable from a valid pin value.
To be able to detect failures and properly use the value of a GPIO in
scripts we introduce the `gpio read` command that sets the variable
`name` to the value of the pin. Return code of the `gpio read` command
can be used to check for CMD_RET_SUCCESS or CMD_RET_FAILURE.
CONFIG_CMD_GPIO_READ is used to enable the `gpio read` command.
Signed-off-by: Diego Rondini <diego.rondini@kynetics.com>
|
|
Generic Python Test cases are developed to verfiy 'gpio' command.
Signed-off-by: Adarsh Babu Kalepalli <opensource.kab@gmail.com>
|
|
4dbc107f4683 ("cmd: gpio: Correct do_gpio() return value") correctly
changed the behaviour of the gpio command to return CMD_RET_SUCCESS or
CMD_RET_FAILURE, but any existing script which expects the return value
to be the pin value is broken by this change.
Reinstate the legacy behaviour for `gpio input` only.
Fixes: 4dbc107f4683 ("cmd: gpio: Correct do_gpio() return value")
Signed-off-by: Alex Kiernan <alex.kiernan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Kiernan <alex.kiernan@hivehome.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
