summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>2025-06-16 17:14:17 +0200
committerUwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org>2025-07-07 08:39:35 +0200
commit0b4d1abe5ca568c5b7f667345ec2b5ad0fb2e54b (patch)
treeaea2f530d299c46a79c360473804dfc3df4dfdf8
parentfd0b06972a8f92d57358e62267f5925721c73c6e (diff)
pwm: rockchip: Round period/duty down on apply, up on get
With CONFIG_PWM_DEBUG=y, the rockchip PWM driver produces warnings like this: rockchip-pwm fd8b0010.pwm: .apply is supposed to round down duty_cycle (requested: 23529/50000, applied: 23542/50000) This is because the driver chooses ROUND_CLOSEST for purported idempotency reasons. However, it's possible to keep idempotency while always rounding down in .apply(). Do this by making .get_state() always round up, and making .apply() always round down. This is done with u64 maths, and setting both period and duty to U32_MAX (the biggest the hardware can support) if they would exceed their 32 bits confines. Fixes: 12f9ce4a5198 ("pwm: rockchip: Fix period and duty cycle approximation") Fixes: 1ebb74cf3537 ("pwm: rockchip: Add support for hardware readout") Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250616-rockchip-pwm-rounding-fix-v2-1-a9c65acad7b6@collabora.com Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r--drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c33
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
index c5f50e5eaf41..67b85bdb491b 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/limits.h>
+#include <linux/math64.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
@@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
struct pwm_state *state)
{
struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip);
+ u64 prescaled_ns = (u64)pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC;
u32 enable_conf = pc->data->enable_conf;
unsigned long clk_rate;
u64 tmp;
@@ -78,12 +81,12 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
clk_rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk);
tmp = readl_relaxed(pc->base + pc->data->regs.period);
- tmp *= pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC;
- state->period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(tmp, clk_rate);
+ tmp *= prescaled_ns;
+ state->period = DIV_U64_ROUND_UP(tmp, clk_rate);
tmp = readl_relaxed(pc->base + pc->data->regs.duty);
- tmp *= pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC;
- state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(tmp, clk_rate);
+ tmp *= prescaled_ns;
+ state->duty_cycle = DIV_U64_ROUND_UP(tmp, clk_rate);
val = readl_relaxed(pc->base + pc->data->regs.ctrl);
state->enabled = (val & enable_conf) == enable_conf;
@@ -103,8 +106,9 @@ static void rockchip_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
const struct pwm_state *state)
{
struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip);
- unsigned long period, duty;
- u64 clk_rate, div;
+ u64 prescaled_ns = (u64)pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC;
+ u64 clk_rate, tmp;
+ u32 period_ticks, duty_ticks;
u32 ctrl;
clk_rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk);
@@ -114,12 +118,15 @@ static void rockchip_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
* bits, every possible input period can be obtained using the
* default prescaler value for all practical clock rate values.
*/
- div = clk_rate * state->period;
- period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(div,
- pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC);
+ tmp = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(clk_rate, state->period, prescaled_ns);
+ if (tmp > U32_MAX)
+ tmp = U32_MAX;
+ period_ticks = tmp;
- div = clk_rate * state->duty_cycle;
- duty = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(div, pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC);
+ tmp = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(clk_rate, state->duty_cycle, prescaled_ns);
+ if (tmp > U32_MAX)
+ tmp = U32_MAX;
+ duty_ticks = tmp;
/*
* Lock the period and duty of previous configuration, then
@@ -131,8 +138,8 @@ static void rockchip_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
writel_relaxed(ctrl, pc->base + pc->data->regs.ctrl);
}
- writel(period, pc->base + pc->data->regs.period);
- writel(duty, pc->base + pc->data->regs.duty);
+ writel(period_ticks, pc->base + pc->data->regs.period);
+ writel(duty_ticks, pc->base + pc->data->regs.duty);
if (pc->data->supports_polarity) {
ctrl &= ~PWM_POLARITY_MASK;