summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2026-09-10 23:35:07 +0200
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2026-09-10 16:55:47 -0700
commit88ce88e933e40f4ab4b81a5e9d0a10328583f593 (patch)
tree366bd4dfcf7ba136a6651230fbb3b5b9b011dd90
parente4a62833adff6ef0fe7c0b90393204fe3c26b5c5 (diff)
bpf: Add KF_PERFMON kfunc flag
Tracing related BPF helpers e.g. under bpf_base_func_proto() are gated behind CAP_PERFMON. However, the same is currently not true for kfuncs and they are accessible via plain CAP_BPF. Add a new KF_PERFMON flag which can be used such that check_kfunc_call() ensures env->allow_ptr_leaks is permitted. This follows similar pattern to existing KF_DESTRUCTIVE flag. The rejection returns -EPERM to match the other CAP_PERFMON gates in the verifier, that is, check_ptr_to_btf_access() and check_ptr_to_map_access(), which report the very same policy to user space. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260910213510.49358-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r--Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst10
-rw-r--r--include/linux/btf.h1
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c14
3 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst b/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
index 85f73e0bbd0f..6691fe8a32c3 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
@@ -486,6 +486,16 @@ Example usage in BPF program:
/* note that the last argument is omitted */
bpf_task_work_schedule_signal(task, &work->tw, &arrmap, task_work_callback);
+2.5.10 KF_PERFMON flag
+----------------------
+
+The KF_PERFMON flag is used for kfuncs that can expose kernel memory or kernel
+addresses to the BPF program, for example by reading through a pointer that the
+verifier does not check. Calling such a kfunc requires CAP_PERFMON, or
+CAP_SYS_ADMIN, in the same way that the equivalent BPF helpers are gated in
+bpf_base_func_proto(). A program loaded with CAP_BPF alone is rejected at load
+time.
+
2.6 Registering the kfuncs
--------------------------
diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
index 89d5a5c4f117..7c62ea17b116 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf.h
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@
#define KF_ARENA_ARG2 (1 << 15) /* kfunc takes an arena pointer as its second argument */
#define KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS (1 << 16) /* kfunc has implicit arguments supplied by the verifier */
#define KF_SPINLOCK_SAFE (1 << 17) /* kfunc is allowed inside bpf_spin_lock-ed region */
+#define KF_PERFMON (1 << 18) /* kfunc requires CAP_PERFMON */
/*
* Tag marking a kernel function as a kfunc. This is meant to minimize the
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 72a3f5998dd2..939e535a3442 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -11356,6 +11356,11 @@ static bool is_kfunc_destructive(struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_DESTRUCTIVE;
}
+static bool is_kfunc_perfmon(struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
+{
+ return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_PERFMON;
+}
+
static bool is_kfunc_rcu(struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
{
return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_RCU;
@@ -13834,6 +13839,15 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
return -EACCES;
}
+ if (is_kfunc_perfmon(&meta) && !env->allow_ptr_leaks) {
+ verbose(env, "%s is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN\n",
+ func_name);
+ operation = bpf_diag_fmt(env, "kfunc %s", func_name);
+ bpf_diag_policy(env, insn_idx, operation, "the kfunc requires CAP_PERFMON",
+ "Load the program with CAP_PERFMON, or avoid the kfunc.");
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
+
sleepable = bpf_is_kfunc_sleepable(&meta);
if (sleepable && !in_sleepable(env)) {
verbose(env, "program must be sleepable to call sleepable kfunc %s\n", func_name);