openvswitch: vport: fix race between linking and the device notifier

Sashiko reports that it is technically possible that we got the device
reference, but by the time we're linking it to the OVS datapath, it
may be already in the process of being deleted.  In this case if the
notifier wins the race for RTNL, it will see that the device is not
yet in the OVS datapath (ovs_netdev_get_vport() will fail in the
dp_device_event()) and will do nothing.  Then the ovs_netdev_link()
will take the RTNL and link the unregistering device to OVS datapath.

Eventually, netdev_wait_allrefs_any() will re-broadcast the event and
the device will be properly detached, but it will take at least a
second before that happens, so it's not something we should rely on.

Let's avoid linking the non-registered device in the first place.

Note: As per documentation, RTNL doesn't protect the reg_state, but
it actually does for all the state transitions we care about here,
so it should not be necessary to use READ_ONCE or taking the instance
lock.  We can still do that, but we have a few more places even in
this file where the reg_state is accessed without those while under
RTNL, and many more places like this across the kernel code, so it
might make more sense to change all of them in a more centralized
fashion in the future, if necessary.

Fixes: ccb1352e76cf ("net: Add Open vSwitch kernel components.")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260514184702.2461435-1-i.maximets@ovn.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c b/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c
index c42642075685..e7e8490a53d8 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c
@@ -83,6 +83,14 @@ struct vport *ovs_netdev_link(struct vport *vport, bool tunnel)
 	}
 
 	rtnl_lock();
+	/* Do not link devices that are not registered to avoid a potential
+	 * race with the NETDEV_UNREGISTER notification in dp_device_event().
+	 */
+	if (vport->dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) {
+		err = -ENODEV;
+		goto error_put_unlock;
+	}
+
 	err = netdev_master_upper_dev_link(vport->dev,
 					   get_dpdev(vport->dp),
 					   NULL, NULL, NULL);