diff options
| author | Marco Elver <elver@google.com> | 2025-12-19 16:40:13 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2026-01-05 16:43:33 +0100 |
| commit | e4588c25c9d122b5847b88e18b184404b6959160 (patch) | |
| tree | 00ddee9629bf524daf0bca778c0f9d1be4080dfe /Documentation/mm | |
| parent | 5b63d0ae94ccfd64dcbdb693d88eb3650eb3c64c (diff) | |
compiler-context-analysis: Remove __cond_lock() function-like helper
As discussed in [1], removing __cond_lock() will improve the readability
of trylock code. Now that Sparse context tracking support has been
removed, we can also remove __cond_lock().
Change existing APIs to either drop __cond_lock() completely, or make
use of the __cond_acquires() function attribute instead.
In particular, spinlock and rwlock implementations required switching
over to inline helpers rather than statement-expressions for their
trylock_* variants.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250207082832.GU7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/ [1]
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251219154418.3592607-25-elver@google.com
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/mm')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/mm/process_addrs.rst | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/mm/process_addrs.rst b/Documentation/mm/process_addrs.rst index 7f2f3e87071d..851680ead45f 100644 --- a/Documentation/mm/process_addrs.rst +++ b/Documentation/mm/process_addrs.rst @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ To access PTE-level page tables, a helper like :c:func:`!pte_offset_map_lock` or :c:func:`!pte_offset_map` can be used depending on stability requirements. These map the page table into kernel memory if required, take the RCU lock, and depending on variant, may also look up or acquire the PTE lock. -See the comment on :c:func:`!__pte_offset_map_lock`. +See the comment on :c:func:`!pte_offset_map_lock`. Atomicity ^^^^^^^^^ @@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ must be released via :c:func:`!pte_unmap_unlock`. .. note:: There are some variants on this, such as :c:func:`!pte_offset_map_rw_nolock` when we know we hold the PTE stable but for brevity we do not explore this. See the comment for - :c:func:`!__pte_offset_map_lock` for more details. + :c:func:`!pte_offset_map_lock` for more details. When modifying data in ranges we typically only wish to allocate higher page tables as necessary, using these locks to avoid races or overwriting anything, @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ At the leaf page table, that is the PTE, we can't entirely rely on this pattern as we have separate PMD and PTE locks and a THP collapse for instance might have eliminated the PMD entry as well as the PTE from under us. -This is why :c:func:`!__pte_offset_map_lock` locklessly retrieves the PMD entry +This is why :c:func:`!pte_offset_map_lock` locklessly retrieves the PMD entry for the PTE, carefully checking it is as expected, before acquiring the PTE-specific lock, and then *again* checking that the PMD entry is as expected. |
