summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>2024-10-02 21:16:55 +0300
committerJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>2024-10-04 10:29:24 +0300
commit8231ac7e72ae38e0e13d1eab0a11b48878bc9779 (patch)
treeb18ae0f124239162783a715146472a12137ad835 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
parent45c548642b563ec7fd761a3f3a412e99b3c88e27 (diff)
drm/i915: use NULL for zero wakeref_t instead of plain integer 0
As of commit 2edc6a75f26c ("drm/i915: switch intel_wakeref_t underlying type to struct ref_tracker *") we gained quite a few sparse warnings about "Using plain integer as NULL pointer" for using 0 to initialize wakeref_t. Switch to NULL everywhere. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241002181655.582597-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
index 88abc4c7cda1..ffeee9daa568 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ intel_wakeref_t intel_pps_unlock(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
mutex_unlock(&display->pps.mutex);
intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE, wakeref);
- return 0;
+ return NULL;
}
static void