summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/flex_array.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>2013-12-05 16:27:37 +0100
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2014-11-21 09:22:54 -0800
commita4ad890a7e7fac8177d93a4345c7a239339840ed (patch)
tree1a212b616b9db67138176bd85a1b915a35155b62 /include/linux/flex_array.h
parent5eb4491e33b498f05bf51c75ed4abc46a5fccaba (diff)
br: fix use of ->rx_handler_data in code executed on non-rx_handler path
commit 859828c0ea476b42f3a93d69d117aaba90994b6f upstream. br_stp_rcv() is reached by non-rx_handler path. That means there is no guarantee that dev is bridge port and therefore simple NULL check of ->rx_handler_data is not enough. There is need to check if dev is really bridge port and since only rcu read lock is held here, do it by checking ->rx_handler pointer. Note that synchronize_net() in netdev_rx_handler_unregister() ensures this approach as valid. Introduced originally by: commit f350a0a87374418635689471606454abc7beaa3a "bridge: use rx_handler_data pointer to store net_bridge_port pointer" Fixed but not in the best way by: commit b5ed54e94d324f17c97852296d61a143f01b227a "bridge: fix RCU races with bridge port" Reintroduced by: commit 716ec052d2280d511e10e90ad54a86f5b5d4dcc2 "bridge: fix NULL pointer deref of br_port_get_rcu" Please apply to stable trees as well. Thanks. RH bugzilla reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025770 Reported-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com> Debugged-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Andrew Collins <bsderandrew@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/flex_array.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions