Merge branch 'bpf: Add 64bit enum value support'

Yonghong Song says:

====================

Currently, btf only supports upto 32bit enum value with BTF_KIND_ENUM.
But in kernel, some enum has 64bit values, e.g., in uapi bpf.h, we have
  enum {
        BPF_F_INDEX_MASK                = 0xffffffffULL,
        BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU               = BPF_F_INDEX_MASK,
        BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK               = (0xfffffULL << 32),
  };
With BTF_KIND_ENUM, the value for BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK will be encoded
as 0 which is incorrect.

To solve this problem, BTF_KIND_ENUM64 is proposed in this patch set
to support enum 64bit values. Also, since sometimes there is a need
to generate C code from btf, e.g., vmlinux.h, btf kflag support
is also added for BTF_KIND_ENUM and BTF_KIND_ENUM64 to indicate
signedness, helping proper value printout.

Changelog:
  v4 -> v5:
    - skip newly-added enum64 C test if clang version <= 14.
  v3 -> v4:
    - rename btf_type_is_any_enum() to btf_is_any_enum() to favor
      consistency in libbpf.
    - fix sign extension issue in btf_dump_get_enum_value().
    - fix BPF_CORE_FIELD_SIGNED signedness issue in bpf_core_calc_field_relo().
  v2 -> v3:
    - Implement separate btf_equal_enum()/btf_equal_enum64() and
      btf_compat_enum()/btf_compat_enum64().
    - Add a new enum64 placeholder type dynamicly for enum64 sanitization.
    - For bpftool output and unit selftest, printed out signed/unsigned
      encoding as well.
    - fix some issues with BTF_KIND_ENUM is doc and clarified sign extension
      rules for enum values.
  v1 -> v2:
    - Changed kflag default from signed to unsigned
    - Fixed sanitization issue
    - Broke down libbpf related patches for easier review
    - Added more tests
    - More code refactorization
    - Corresponding llvm patch (to support enum64) is also updated
====================

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
index 2611cea2c2b6..1bfed7fa0428 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf.h
@@ -177,6 +177,19 @@ static inline bool btf_type_is_enum(const struct btf_type *t)
 	return BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) == BTF_KIND_ENUM;
 }
 
+static inline bool btf_is_any_enum(const struct btf_type *t)
+{
+	return BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) == BTF_KIND_ENUM ||
+	       BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) == BTF_KIND_ENUM64;
+}
+
+static inline bool btf_kind_core_compat(const struct btf_type *t1,
+					const struct btf_type *t2)
+{
+	return BTF_INFO_KIND(t1->info) == BTF_INFO_KIND(t2->info) ||
+	       (btf_is_any_enum(t1) && btf_is_any_enum(t2));
+}
+
 static inline bool str_is_empty(const char *s)
 {
 	return !s || !s[0];
@@ -192,6 +205,16 @@ static inline bool btf_is_enum(const struct btf_type *t)
 	return btf_kind(t) == BTF_KIND_ENUM;
 }
 
+static inline bool btf_is_enum64(const struct btf_type *t)
+{
+	return btf_kind(t) == BTF_KIND_ENUM64;
+}
+
+static inline u64 btf_enum64_value(const struct btf_enum64 *e)
+{
+	return ((u64)e->val_hi32 << 32) | e->val_lo32;
+}
+
 static inline bool btf_is_composite(const struct btf_type *t)
 {
 	u16 kind = btf_kind(t);
@@ -332,6 +355,11 @@ static inline struct btf_enum *btf_enum(const struct btf_type *t)
 	return (struct btf_enum *)(t + 1);
 }
 
+static inline struct btf_enum64 *btf_enum64(const struct btf_type *t)
+{
+	return (struct btf_enum64 *)(t + 1);
+}
+
 static inline const struct btf_var_secinfo *btf_type_var_secinfo(
 		const struct btf_type *t)
 {