Merge branch 'page_pool-bnxt_en-unlink-old-page-pool-in-queue-api-using-helper'

David Wei says:

====================
page_pool: bnxt_en: unlink old page pool in queue api using helper

56ef27e3 unexported page_pool_unlink_napi() and renamed it to
page_pool_disable_direct_recycling(). This is because there was no
in-tree user of page_pool_unlink_napi().

Since then Rx queue API and an implementation in bnxt got merged. In the
bnxt implementation, it broadly follows the following steps: allocate
new queue memory + page pool, stop old rx queue, swap, then destroy old
queue memory + page pool.

The existing NAPI instance is re-used so when the old page pool that is
no longer used but still linked to this shared NAPI instance is
destroyed, it will trigger warnings.

In my initial patches I unlinked a page pool from a NAPI instance
directly. Instead, export page_pool_disable_direct_recycling() and call
that instead to avoid having a driver touch a core struct.
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240627030200.3647145-1-dw@davidwei.uk
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/include/net/page_pool/types.h b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
index 7e8477057f3d..9093a964fc33 100644
--- a/include/net/page_pool/types.h
+++ b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
@@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ struct page_pool *page_pool_create_percpu(const struct page_pool_params *params,
 struct xdp_mem_info;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL
+void page_pool_disable_direct_recycling(struct page_pool *pool);
 void page_pool_destroy(struct page_pool *pool);
 void page_pool_use_xdp_mem(struct page_pool *pool, void (*disconnect)(void *),
 			   const struct xdp_mem_info *mem);