diff options
| author | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2021-11-01 14:10:00 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2021-11-01 14:10:00 -0700 |
| commit | f27a6fad14e24dfc755dfcdc08d9a3f514ddb593 (patch) | |
| tree | d48c79c0279c3a198eb3724d7d56ac9fe7b00ff8 /include | |
| parent | 36e70b9b06bf14a0fac87315f0e73d6e17e80aad (diff) | |
| parent | 31122b2f768bde5281037141bb658f117bea102e (diff) | |
Merge branch 'introduce dummy BPF STRUCT_OPS'
Hou Tao says:
====================
Hi,
Currently the test of BPF STRUCT_OPS depends on the specific bpf
implementation (e.g, tcp_congestion_ops), but it can not cover all
basic functionalities (e.g, return value handling), so introduce
a dummy BPF STRUCT_OPS for test purpose.
Instead of loading a userspace-implemeted bpf_dummy_ops map into
kernel and calling the specific function by writing to sysfs provided
by bpf_testmode.ko, only loading bpf_dummy_ops related prog into
kernel and calling these prog by bpf_prog_test_run(). The latter
is more flexible and has no dependency on extra kernel module.
Now the return value handling is supported by test_1(...) ops,
and passing multiple arguments is supported by test_2(...) ops.
If more is needed, test_x(...) ops can be added afterwards.
Comments are always welcome.
Regards,
Hou
Change Log:
v4:
* add Acked-by tags in patch 1~4
* patch 2: remove unncessary comments and update commit message
accordingly
* patch 4: remove unnecessary nr checking in dummy_ops_init_args()
v3: https://www.spinics.net/lists/bpf/msg48303.html
* rebase on bpf-next
* address comments for Martin, mainly include: merge patch 3 &
patch 4 in v2, fix names of btf ctx access check helpers,
handle CONFIG_NET, fix leak in dummy_ops_init_args(), and
simplify bpf_dummy_init()
* patch 4: use a loop to check args in test_dummy_multiple_args()
v2: https://www.spinics.net/lists/bpf/msg47948.html
* rebase on bpf-next
* add test_2(...) ops to test the passing of multiple arguments
* a new patch (patch #2) is added to factor out ctx access helpers
* address comments from Martin & Andrii
v1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/bpf/msg46787.html
RFC: https://www.spinics.net/lists/bpf/msg46117.html
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/bpf.h | 43 |
1 files changed, 43 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 6deebf8bf78f..c098089c1b54 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -1000,6 +1000,10 @@ bool bpf_struct_ops_get(const void *kdata); void bpf_struct_ops_put(const void *kdata); int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value); +int bpf_struct_ops_prepare_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs, + struct bpf_prog *prog, + const struct btf_func_model *model, + void *image, void *image_end); static inline bool bpf_try_module_get(const void *data, struct module *owner) { if (owner == BPF_MODULE_OWNER) @@ -1014,6 +1018,22 @@ static inline void bpf_module_put(const void *data, struct module *owner) else module_put(owner); } + +#ifdef CONFIG_NET +/* Define it here to avoid the use of forward declaration */ +struct bpf_dummy_ops_state { + int val; +}; + +struct bpf_dummy_ops { + int (*test_1)(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *cb); + int (*test_2)(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *cb, int a1, unsigned short a2, + char a3, unsigned long a4); +}; + +int bpf_struct_ops_test_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr, + union bpf_attr __user *uattr); +#endif #else static inline const struct bpf_struct_ops *bpf_struct_ops_find(u32 type_id) { @@ -1646,6 +1666,29 @@ bool bpf_prog_test_check_kfunc_call(u32 kfunc_id, struct module *owner); bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type, const struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info); + +static inline bool bpf_tracing_ctx_access(int off, int size, + enum bpf_access_type type) +{ + if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(__u64) * MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS) + return false; + if (type != BPF_READ) + return false; + if (off % size != 0) + return false; + return true; +} + +static inline bool bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, + enum bpf_access_type type, + const struct bpf_prog *prog, + struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info) +{ + if (!bpf_tracing_ctx_access(off, size, type)) + return false; + return btf_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info); +} + int btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t, int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type atype, |
