diff options
author | Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com> | 2025-09-05 10:53:08 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2025-09-08 10:04:37 -0700 |
commit | 0409819a002165e9471113598323eb72bba17a53 (patch) | |
tree | 24155e6ce3a3ac3fb2e17a633db120f8ecf1d070 /kernel/bpf/helpers.c | |
parent | 34f86083a4e1887ada121d2b5c4f47cc038a3356 (diff) |
bpf: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
system_unbound_wq should be the default workqueue so as not to enforce
locality constraints for random work whenever it's not required.
Adding system_dfl_wq to encourage its use when unbound work should be used.
queue_work() / queue_delayed_work() / mod_delayed_work() will now use the
new unbound wq: whether the user still use the old wq a warn will be
printed along with a wq redirect to the new one.
The old system_unbound_wq will be kept for a few release cycles.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250905085309.94596-3-marco.crivellari@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/helpers.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c index 588bc7e36436..1ef1e65bd7d0 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c @@ -1594,7 +1594,7 @@ void bpf_timer_cancel_and_free(void *val) * timer callback. */ if (this_cpu_read(hrtimer_running)) { - queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &t->cb.delete_work); + queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &t->cb.delete_work); return; } @@ -1607,7 +1607,7 @@ void bpf_timer_cancel_and_free(void *val) if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&t->timer) >= 0) kfree_rcu(t, cb.rcu); else - queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &t->cb.delete_work); + queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &t->cb.delete_work); } else { bpf_timer_delete_work(&t->cb.delete_work); } |