diff options
| author | Yazhou Tang <tangyazhou518@outlook.com> | 2025-09-30 23:04:33 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2025-10-01 15:43:13 -0700 |
| commit | 55c0ced59fe17dee34e9dfd5f7be63cbab207758 (patch) | |
| tree | af28c0cc29c7a82b4f5b858eb49e623d08d7b86c /kernel | |
| parent | 1bd3773aad5411f3542aa2e5328df58454706ca6 (diff) | |
bpf: Reject negative offsets for ALU ops
When verifying BPF programs, the check_alu_op() function validates
instructions with ALU operations. The 'offset' field in these
instructions is a signed 16-bit integer.
The existing check 'insn->off > 1' was intended to ensure the offset is
either 0, or 1 for BPF_MOD/BPF_DIV. However, because 'insn->off' is
signed, this check incorrectly accepts all negative values (e.g., -1).
This commit tightens the validation by changing the condition to
'(insn->off != 0 && insn->off != 1)'. This ensures that any value
other than the explicitly permitted 0 and 1 is rejected, hardening the
verifier against malformed BPF programs.
Co-developed-by: Shenghao Yuan <shenghaoyuan0928@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenghao Yuan <shenghaoyuan0928@163.com>
Co-developed-by: Tianci Cao <ziye@zju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Tianci Cao <ziye@zju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Yazhou Tang <tangyazhou518@outlook.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Fixes: ec0e2da95f72 ("bpf: Support new signed div/mod instructions.")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_70D024BAE70A0A309A4781694C7B764B0608@qq.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index a5c52d53502a..ff40e5e65c43 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -15804,7 +15804,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } else { /* all other ALU ops: and, sub, xor, add, ... */ if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { - if (insn->imm != 0 || insn->off > 1 || + if (insn->imm != 0 || (insn->off != 0 && insn->off != 1) || (insn->off == 1 && opcode != BPF_MOD && opcode != BPF_DIV)) { verbose(env, "BPF_ALU uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; @@ -15814,7 +15814,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) if (err) return err; } else { - if (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off > 1 || + if (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || (insn->off != 0 && insn->off != 1) || (insn->off == 1 && opcode != BPF_MOD && opcode != BPF_DIV)) { verbose(env, "BPF_ALU uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; |