diff options
| author | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2018-01-26 17:06:23 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2018-01-26 17:06:24 -0800 |
| commit | 8223967fe0b8eb2448cca5cfe3c64a0838e6f60d (patch) | |
| tree | dc262d4c79d65428bb0ca56b377d732a1ff9438e /kernel | |
| parent | 1651e39e4a1adacd24e953aae46ba9b66d996035 (diff) | |
| parent | af32efeede9e188fefe0af51d117c31cf281de65 (diff) | |
Merge branch 'fix-lpm-map'
Yonghong Song says:
====================
A kernel page fault which happens in lpm map trie_get_next_key is reported
by syzbot and Eric. The issue was introduced by commit b471f2f1de8b
("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command for LPM_TRIE map").
Patch #1 fixed the issue in the kernel and patch #2 adds a multithreaded
test case in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c | 26 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c index 8f083ea9d4b9..7b469d10d0e9 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c @@ -593,11 +593,10 @@ unlock: static int trie_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key, void *_next_key) { + struct lpm_trie_node *node, *next_node = NULL, *parent, *search_root; struct lpm_trie *trie = container_of(map, struct lpm_trie, map); struct bpf_lpm_trie_key *key = _key, *next_key = _next_key; - struct lpm_trie_node *node, *next_node = NULL, *parent; struct lpm_trie_node **node_stack = NULL; - struct lpm_trie_node __rcu **root; int err = 0, stack_ptr = -1; unsigned int next_bit; size_t matchlen; @@ -614,14 +613,13 @@ static int trie_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key, void *_next_key) */ /* Empty trie */ - if (!rcu_dereference(trie->root)) + search_root = rcu_dereference(trie->root); + if (!search_root) return -ENOENT; /* For invalid key, find the leftmost node in the trie */ - if (!key || key->prefixlen > trie->max_prefixlen) { - root = &trie->root; + if (!key || key->prefixlen > trie->max_prefixlen) goto find_leftmost; - } node_stack = kmalloc(trie->max_prefixlen * sizeof(struct lpm_trie_node *), GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN); @@ -629,7 +627,7 @@ static int trie_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key, void *_next_key) return -ENOMEM; /* Try to find the exact node for the given key */ - for (node = rcu_dereference(trie->root); node;) { + for (node = search_root; node;) { node_stack[++stack_ptr] = node; matchlen = longest_prefix_match(trie, node, key); if (node->prefixlen != matchlen || @@ -640,10 +638,8 @@ static int trie_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key, void *_next_key) node = rcu_dereference(node->child[next_bit]); } if (!node || node->prefixlen != key->prefixlen || - (node->flags & LPM_TREE_NODE_FLAG_IM)) { - root = &trie->root; + (node->flags & LPM_TREE_NODE_FLAG_IM)) goto find_leftmost; - } /* The node with the exactly-matching key has been found, * find the first node in postorder after the matched node. @@ -651,10 +647,10 @@ static int trie_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key, void *_next_key) node = node_stack[stack_ptr]; while (stack_ptr > 0) { parent = node_stack[stack_ptr - 1]; - if (rcu_dereference(parent->child[0]) == node && - rcu_dereference(parent->child[1])) { - root = &parent->child[1]; - goto find_leftmost; + if (rcu_dereference(parent->child[0]) == node) { + search_root = rcu_dereference(parent->child[1]); + if (search_root) + goto find_leftmost; } if (!(parent->flags & LPM_TREE_NODE_FLAG_IM)) { next_node = parent; @@ -673,7 +669,7 @@ find_leftmost: /* Find the leftmost non-intermediate node, all intermediate nodes * have exact two children, so this function will never return NULL. */ - for (node = rcu_dereference(*root); node;) { + for (node = search_root; node;) { if (!(node->flags & LPM_TREE_NODE_FLAG_IM)) next_node = node; node = rcu_dereference(node->child[0]); |
