summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>2025-09-18 13:04:48 +0200
committerPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>2025-09-23 11:13:21 +0200
commita4997e17d13767e67170f09bfa0b867862cad9d9 (patch)
tree41906e5e5d5da2477c78554c4e130ddf63e6a837 /net/smc/smc_loopback.c
parent884eee8e43f3072db4111178c98b9aa5c57bcf92 (diff)
net/smc: Decouple sf and attached send_buf in smc_loopback
Before this patch there was the following assumption in smc_loopback.c>smc_lo_move_data(): sf (signalling flag) == 0 : data is already in an attached target dmb sf == 1 : data is not yet in the target dmb This is true for the 2 callers in smc client smcd_cdc_msg_send() : sf=1 smcd_tx_rdma_writes() : sf=0 but should not be a general assumption. Add a bool to struct smc_buf_desc to indicate whether an SMC-D sndbuf_desc is an attached buffer. Don't call move_data() for attached send_buffers, because it is not necessary. Move the data in smc_lo_move_data() if len != 0 and signal when requested. Signed-off-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250918110500.1731261-3-wintera@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/smc/smc_loopback.c')
-rw-r--r--net/smc/smc_loopback.c9
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_loopback.c b/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
index 0eb00bbefd17..1853c26fbbbb 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
@@ -224,12 +224,6 @@ static int smc_lo_move_data(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 dmb_tok,
struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
struct smc_connection *conn;
- if (!sf)
- /* since sndbuf is merged with peer DMB, there is
- * no need to copy data from sndbuf to peer DMB.
- */
- return 0;
-
read_lock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_tok) {
if (tmp_node->token == dmb_tok) {
@@ -244,6 +238,9 @@ static int smc_lo_move_data(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 dmb_tok,
memcpy((char *)rmb_node->cpu_addr + offset, data, size);
read_unlock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ if (!sf)
+ return 0;
+
conn = smcd->conn[rmb_node->sba_idx];
if (!conn || conn->killed)
return -EPIPE;