diff options
| author | Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com> | 2025-10-30 08:06:45 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> | 2025-11-04 16:10:52 +0100 |
| commit | 462280043466b2bc74483c56a5d5316ff6b16380 (patch) | |
| tree | 837061c5d56dbf02a49dc12550b1df5b6be0a1f2 /rust/kernel/alloc | |
| parent | 27cb3de7f43ac0263474d87a2c84d96f904d73e2 (diff) | |
xsk: do not enable/disable irq when grabbing/releasing xsk_tx_list_lock
The commit ac98d8aab61b ("xsk: wire upp Tx zero-copy functions")
originally introducing this lock put the deletion process in the
sk_destruct which can run in irq context obviously, so the
xxx_irqsave()/xxx_irqrestore() pair was used. But later another
commit 541d7fdd7694 ("xsk: proper AF_XDP socket teardown ordering")
moved the deletion into xsk_release() that only happens in process
context. It means that since this commit, it doesn't necessarily
need that pair.
Now, there are two places that use this xsk_tx_list_lock and only
run in the process context. So avoid manipulating the irq then.
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251030000646.18859-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'rust/kernel/alloc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
