diff options
| author | Onur Özkan <work@onurozkan.dev> | 2025-11-13 17:45:47 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> | 2026-01-19 09:38:10 +0100 |
| commit | 2ad6c5cdc89acfefb01b84afa5e55262c40d6fec (patch) | |
| tree | 40197866451ae5c81e3a7238752c3dadea6d4c71 /rust/kernel | |
| parent | 6c37b6841a92714eba4a7b7f823aea801da4e09f (diff) | |
rust: rbtree: reduce unsafe blocks on pointer derefs
Refactors parts of the get() and find_best_match()
traversal logic to minimize the scope of unsafe blocks
and avoid duplicating same safety comments.
One of the removed comments was also misleading:
// SAFETY: `node` is a non-null node...
Ordering::Equal => return Some(unsafe { &(*this).value }),
as `node` should have been `this`.
No functional changes intended; this is purely a safety
improvement that reduces the amount of unsafe blocks
while keeping all invariants intact.
[ Alice writes:
"One consequence of creating a &_ to the bindings::rb_node struct means
that we assert immutability for the entire struct and not just the
rb_left/rb_right fields, but I have verified that this is ok."
- Miguel ]
Signed-off-by: Onur Özkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Reviewed-by: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251113144547.502-1-work@onurozkan.dev
[ Reworded title and replaced `cursor_lower_bound()` with
`find_best_match()` in message. - Miguel ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'rust/kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | rust/kernel/rbtree.rs | 27 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs b/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs index 4729eb56827a..ed3582d88e4e 100644 --- a/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs +++ b/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs @@ -414,14 +414,17 @@ where // SAFETY: By the type invariant of `Self`, all non-null `rb_node` pointers stored in `self` // point to the links field of `Node<K, V>` objects. let this = unsafe { container_of!(node, Node<K, V>, links) }; + // SAFETY: `this` is a non-null node so it is valid by the type invariants. - node = match key.cmp(unsafe { &(*this).key }) { - // SAFETY: `node` is a non-null node so it is valid by the type invariants. - Ordering::Less => unsafe { (*node).rb_left }, - // SAFETY: `node` is a non-null node so it is valid by the type invariants. - Ordering::Greater => unsafe { (*node).rb_right }, - // SAFETY: `node` is a non-null node so it is valid by the type invariants. - Ordering::Equal => return Some(unsafe { &(*this).value }), + let this_ref = unsafe { &*this }; + + // SAFETY: `node` is a non-null node so it is valid by the type invariants. + let node_ref = unsafe { &*node }; + + node = match key.cmp(&this_ref.key) { + Ordering::Less => node_ref.rb_left, + Ordering::Greater => node_ref.rb_right, + Ordering::Equal => return Some(&this_ref.value), } } None @@ -498,10 +501,10 @@ where let this = unsafe { container_of!(node, Node<K, V>, links) }; // SAFETY: `this` is a non-null node so it is valid by the type invariants. let this_key = unsafe { &(*this).key }; + // SAFETY: `node` is a non-null node so it is valid by the type invariants. - let left_child = unsafe { (*node).rb_left }; - // SAFETY: `node` is a non-null node so it is valid by the type invariants. - let right_child = unsafe { (*node).rb_right }; + let node_ref = unsafe { &*node }; + match key.cmp(this_key) { Ordering::Equal => { // SAFETY: `this` is a non-null node so it is valid by the type invariants. @@ -509,7 +512,7 @@ where break; } Ordering::Greater => { - node = right_child; + node = node_ref.rb_right; } Ordering::Less => { let is_better_match = match best_key { @@ -521,7 +524,7 @@ where // SAFETY: `this` is a non-null node so it is valid by the type invariants. best_links = Some(unsafe { NonNull::new_unchecked(&mut (*this).links) }); } - node = left_child; + node = node_ref.rb_left; } }; } |
