diff options
| author | Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com> | 2026-09-11 13:42:04 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> | 2026-09-16 16:18:08 -0500 |
| commit | d5eefb1d97ad476c734997fa6741651dde610ceb (patch) | |
| tree | 95b0d4e34570801912d7cff0a64273d31ba5788d /scripts | |
| parent | c08fe4da4acc36103152cd310a9eb64a99c161d2 (diff) | |
dtc: dt-check-style: Re-work classifying property continuations
Script has an enumeration of DTS Line types (LineType) and one type is a
continuation of multi-line property. This has limitations, because it
basically hides true type of a continued line which makes certain checks
difficult. For example detecting consecutive blank lines
(LineType.BLANK) will fail if the type is continuation.
clock-names = "foo",
/* Comment */
"bar";
Above code not only fails check_blank_lines() rule, but also messes up
how DtsLine array is constructed - the two middle continued lines are
not put under the DtsLine.continuations array.
The concepts of type of line (blank, preprocessor, property etc) and
actual continuation are orthogonal to most of the checks - the checks
need to know what sort of continued line it is. Fixing this solves
false positives of continued properties with blank lines and comments:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2-common.dtsi:135: [blank-lines] consecutive blank lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2-common.dtsi:135: [blank-lines] blank line at end of node body
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260911-dts-style-checker-blank-lines-v1-1-85e779600d98@oss.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts')
| -rwxr-xr-x | scripts/dtc/dt-check-style | 36 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/scripts/dtc/dt-check-style b/scripts/dtc/dt-check-style index b8c40873905c..46aa4dda6d33 100755 --- a/scripts/dtc/dt-check-style +++ b/scripts/dtc/dt-check-style @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ class LineType(Enum): NODE_OPEN = auto() # something { (with optional label/name/addr) NODE_CLOSE = auto() # }; PROPERTY = auto() # name = value; or name; - CONTINUATION = auto() # continuation of a multi-line property re_cpp_directive = re.compile( @@ -80,11 +79,12 @@ def is_preprocessor(stripped): class DtsLine: __slots__ = ('lineno', 'raw', 'code', 'linetype', 'indent_str', 'stripped', 'is_root', - 'prop_name', 'continuations', + 'prop_name', 'continuation', 'continuations', 'node_name', 'node_addr', 'label', 'ref_name', 'parent', 'depth', 'closures') - def __init__(self, lineno, raw, linetype, depth, indent_str, stripped, is_root = False): + def __init__(self, lineno, raw, linetype, depth, indent_str, stripped, + continuation = False, is_root = False): self.lineno = lineno # 1-based within the block self.raw = raw # Entire raw line self.linetype = linetype @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ class DtsLine: self.code = _strip_strings_and_comments(stripped).rstrip() self.is_root = is_root self.prop_name = None + self.continuation = continuation # Continuation of a multi-line property self.continuations = [] self.node_name = None self.node_addr = None @@ -175,7 +176,7 @@ def classify_lines(text): continue if not stripped: - dl = DtsLine(i, raw, LineType.BLANK, depth, '', '') + dl = DtsLine(i, raw, LineType.BLANK, depth, '', '', continuation=not prev_complete) out.append(dl) continue @@ -184,7 +185,7 @@ def classify_lines(text): else LineType.COMMENT_BODY) if ltype == LineType.COMMENT_END: in_block_comment = False - dl = DtsLine(i, raw, ltype, depth, indent_str, stripped) + dl = DtsLine(i, raw, ltype, depth, indent_str, stripped, continuation=not prev_complete) out.append(dl) continue @@ -202,20 +203,12 @@ def classify_lines(text): if opens_block: in_block_comment = True - if not prev_complete: - dl = DtsLine(i, raw, LineType.CONTINUATION, depth, indent_str, code) - out.append(dl) - prev_complete = (code.endswith(';') or - code.endswith('{') or - code.endswith('};')) - continue - # Pure-comment line: nothing left after stripping. Classify as # COMMENT_START (carries to next line) or COMMENT, and skip the # structural classification entirely. if not code: ltype = LineType.COMMENT_START if opens_block else LineType.COMMENT - dl = DtsLine(i, raw, ltype, depth, indent_str, stripped) + dl = DtsLine(i, raw, ltype, depth, indent_str, stripped, continuation=not prev_complete) out.append(dl) continue @@ -245,7 +238,8 @@ def classify_lines(text): continue # Property (or first line of a multi-line property). - dl = DtsLine(i, raw, LineType.PROPERTY, depth, indent_str, code) + dl = DtsLine(i, raw, LineType.PROPERTY, depth, indent_str, code, + continuation=not prev_complete) parse_property_name(dl) out.append(dl) prev_complete = code.endswith(';') @@ -254,7 +248,7 @@ def classify_lines(text): last_prop = None grouped = [] for dl in out: - if dl.linetype == LineType.CONTINUATION and last_prop is not None: + if dl.continuation and last_prop is not None: last_prop.continuations.append(dl) continue if dl.linetype == LineType.PROPERTY: @@ -535,6 +529,8 @@ def check_continuation_alignment(ctx): dl_value_complete = rest.endswith('",') or rest.endswith('>,') target_col = _display_col(_strip_strings_and_comments(dl.raw[:eq + 1 + m.start(1)])) for cont in dl.continuations: + if cont.linetype == LineType.BLANK: + continue target_offset = 0 err_msg_explanation = 'to < or "' if not dl_value_complete: @@ -582,10 +578,10 @@ def check_indent_consistent(ctx): return for dl in ctx.lines: + if dl.continuation: + continue # continuations align to <, not to indent unit if dl.linetype in (LineType.BLANK, LineType.PREPROCESSOR): continue - if dl.linetype == LineType.CONTINUATION: - continue # continuations align to <, not to indent unit if dl.linetype in (LineType.COMMENT_BODY, LineType.COMMENT_END): continue if not dl.indent_str: @@ -890,6 +886,8 @@ def check_required_blank_lines(ctx): if d.linetype == LineType.NODE_CLOSE and \ d.depth == body_depth - 1 and depth_inside == 0: break + if d.continuation: + continue # Track depth inside nested children so we only look at # immediate-body items. if d.linetype == LineType.NODE_OPEN and \ @@ -909,8 +907,6 @@ def check_required_blank_lines(ctx): LineType.COMMENT_BODY, LineType.COMMENT_END, LineType.PREPROCESSOR): continue - if d.linetype == LineType.CONTINUATION: - continue needs_blank = False if d.linetype == LineType.NODE_OPEN: |
