diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_mul.c | 38 |
2 files changed, 40 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c index 77ec95d4ffaa..e35c216dbaf2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ #include "verifier_meta_access.skel.h" #include "verifier_movsx.skel.h" #include "verifier_mtu.skel.h" +#include "verifier_mul.skel.h" #include "verifier_netfilter_ctx.skel.h" #include "verifier_netfilter_retcode.skel.h" #include "verifier_bpf_fastcall.skel.h" @@ -194,6 +195,7 @@ void test_verifier_may_goto_1(void) { RUN(verifier_may_goto_1); } void test_verifier_may_goto_2(void) { RUN(verifier_may_goto_2); } void test_verifier_meta_access(void) { RUN(verifier_meta_access); } void test_verifier_movsx(void) { RUN(verifier_movsx); } +void test_verifier_mul(void) { RUN(verifier_mul); } void test_verifier_netfilter_ctx(void) { RUN(verifier_netfilter_ctx); } void test_verifier_netfilter_retcode(void) { RUN(verifier_netfilter_retcode); } void test_verifier_bpf_fastcall(void) { RUN(verifier_bpf_fastcall); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_mul.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_mul.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7145fe3351d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_mul.c @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2025 Nandakumar Edamana */ +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h> +#include "bpf_misc.h" + +/* Intended to test the abstract multiplication technique(s) used by + * the verifier. Using assembly to avoid compiler optimizations. + */ +SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1") +void BPF_PROG(mul_precise, int x) +{ + /* First, force the verifier to be uncertain about the value: + * unsigned int a = (bpf_get_prandom_u32() & 0x2) | 0x1; + * + * Assuming the verifier is using tnum, a must be tnum{.v=0x1, .m=0x2}. + * Then a * 0x3 would be m0m1 (m for uncertain). Added imprecision + * would cause the following to fail, because the required return value + * is 0: + * return (a * 0x3) & 0x4); + */ + asm volatile ("\ + call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];\ + r0 &= 0x2;\ + r0 |= 0x1;\ + r0 *= 0x3;\ + r0 &= 0x4;\ + if r0 != 0 goto l0_%=;\ + r0 = 0;\ + goto l1_%=;\ +l0_%=:\ + r0 = 1;\ +l1_%=:\ +" : + : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32) + : __clobber_all); +} |