summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c19
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
index a8d56ebf06a2..7a6c07f6aaeb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
@@ -691,10 +691,9 @@ int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *connector)
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
- bool try_intel_interface = false;
+ bool try_intel_interface = false, try_vesa_interface = false;
- /*
- * Check the VBT and user's module parameters to figure out which
+ /* Check the VBT and user's module parameters to figure out which
* interfaces to probe
*/
switch (display->params.enable_dpcd_backlight) {
@@ -703,6 +702,7 @@ int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *connector)
case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_AUTO:
switch (panel->vbt.backlight.type) {
case INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE:
+ try_vesa_interface = true;
break;
case INTEL_BACKLIGHT_DISPLAY_DDI:
try_intel_interface = true;
@@ -715,12 +715,20 @@ int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *connector)
if (panel->vbt.backlight.type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE)
try_intel_interface = true;
+ try_vesa_interface = true;
+ break;
+ case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_VESA:
+ try_vesa_interface = true;
break;
case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_INTEL:
try_intel_interface = true;
break;
}
+ /* For eDP 1.5 and above we are supposed to use VESA interface for brightness control */
+ if (intel_dp->edp_dpcd[0] >= DP_EDP_15)
+ try_vesa_interface = true;
+
/*
* Since Intel has their own backlight control interface, the majority of machines out there
* using DPCD backlight controls with Intel GPUs will be using this interface as opposed to
@@ -733,9 +741,6 @@ int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *connector)
* panel with Intel's OUI - which is also required for us to be able to detect Intel's
* backlight interface at all. This means that the only sensible way for us to detect both
* interfaces is to probe for Intel's first, and VESA's second.
- *
- * Also there is a chance some VBTs may advertise false Intel backlight support even if the
- * TCON DPCD says otherwise. This means we keep VESA interface as fallback in that case.
*/
if (try_intel_interface && intel_dp->edp_dpcd[0] <= DP_EDP_14b &&
intel_dp_aux_supports_hdr_backlight(connector)) {
@@ -745,7 +750,7 @@ int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *connector)
return 0;
}
- if (intel_dp_aux_supports_vesa_backlight(connector)) {
+ if (try_vesa_interface && intel_dp_aux_supports_vesa_backlight(connector)) {
drm_dbg_kms(dev, "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Using VESA eDP backlight controls\n",
connector->base.base.id, connector->base.name);
panel->backlight.funcs = &intel_dp_vesa_bl_funcs;