| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The added fsession does not prevent running on those architectures, that
haven't added fsession support.
For example, try to run fsession tests on arm64:
test_fsession_basic:PASS:fsession_test__open_and_load 0 nsec
test_fsession_basic:PASS:fsession_attach 0 nsec
check_result:FAIL:test_run_opts err unexpected error: -14 (errno 14)
In order to prevent such errors, add bpf_jit_supports_fsession() to guard
those architectures.
Fixes: 2d419c44658f ("bpf: add fsession support")
Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260131144950.16294-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Test session cookie for fsession. Multiple fsession BPF progs is attached
to bpf_fentry_test1() and session cookie is read and write in the
testcase.
bpf_get_func_ip() will influence the layout of the session cookies, so we
test the cookie in two case: with and without bpf_get_func_ip().
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260124062008.8657-13-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add testcases for BPF_TRACE_FSESSION. The function arguments and return
value are tested both in the entry and exit. And the kfunc
bpf_session_is_ret() is also tested.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260124062008.8657-11-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
