| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
These docs are useful for developers, not users. Move them under that
section.
Suggested-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
The current macro is a misnomer since it does not declare a device
directly. Instead, it declares driver_info record which U-Boot uses at
runtime to create a device.
The distinction seems somewhat minor most of the time, but is becomes
quite confusing when we actually want to declare a device, with
of-platdata. We are left trying to distinguish between a device which
isn't actually device, and a device that is (perhaps an 'instance'?)
It seems better to rename this macro to describe what it actually is. The
macros is not widely used, since boards should use devicetree to declare
devices.
Rename it to U_BOOT_DRVINFO(), which indicates clearly that this is
declaring a new driver_info record, not a device.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Try to maintain some consistency between these variables by using _plat as
a suffix for them.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
This name is far too long. Rename it to remove the 'data' bits. This makes
it consistent with the platdata->plat rename.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Rename this to be consistent with the change from 'platdata'.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
We use 'priv' for private data but often use 'platdata' for platform data.
We can't really use 'pdata' since that is ambiguous (it could mean private
or platform data).
Rename some of the latter variables to end with 'plat' for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
This construct is quite long-winded. In earlier days it made some sense
since auto-allocation was a strange concept. But with driver model now
used pretty universally, we can shorten this to 'auto'. This reduces
verbosity and makes it easier to read.
Coincidentally it also ensures that every declaration is on one line,
thus making dtoc's job easier.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
We need distinguish the following two situations in various SPI APIs:
- given chip select num is invalid
- given chip select num is valid, but no device is attached
Currently -ENODEV is returned for both cases.
For the first case, it's more reasonable to return -EINVAL instead of
-ENODEV for invalid chip select numbers.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> # SoPine
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
|
|
If an SPI controller driver does not implement ops->cs_info, that
probably means any chip select number could be valid, hence let's
return 0 for spi_cs_info().
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> # SoPine
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
|
|
Make it a little easier to find the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Siemsen <ralph.siemsen@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Convert plain text documentation to reStructuredText format and add
it to Sphinx TOC tree. No essential content change.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
