| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Now that the release has happened, bring back the update to zlib.
This reverts commit bbacdd3ef7762fbdeab43ceea5205d1fd0f25bbd.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
This series brings our zlib code more up to date. However, it drops an
important performance improvement that is required on some of our
supported platforms in order to boot Linux before the watchdog resets
the system. Furthermore, the "post increment" version of this
performance loop was not tested, so while we can fix it, it would then
require re-testing all platforms. At this point in time, we will revert
updating zlib (which has had a potential security issue since 2016) and
fix this in the v2024.10 release.
This reverts commit 4914263c9a14315390d3ccc4816cf3a94cfd156d, reversing
changes made to ef8ef5f77c9a998f76a48277a883af1645b54117.
Reported-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Get rid of zlib version which is not correct because of U-Boot related
changes and various CVE backports.
The change in inspired by Linux kernel commit 4f3865fb57a0 ("[PATCH]
zlib_inflate: Upgrade library code to a recent version") which described
ZLIB_VERSION removal as
"This patch also removes ZLIB_VERSION as it no longer has a correct value.
We don't need version checks anyway as the kernel's module handling will
take care of that for us. This removal is also more in keeping with the
zlib author's wishes (http://www.zlib.net/zlib_faq.html#faq24) and I've
added something to the zlib.h header to note its a modified version."
Author describes wish to follow this guidance at
https://www.zlib.net/zlib_faq.html#faq24:
"The license says that altered source versions must be "plainly marked". So
what exactly do I need to do to meet that requirement?
You need to change the ZLIB_VERSION and ZLIB_VERNUM #defines in zlib.h. In
particular, the final version number needs to be changed to f, and an
identification string should be appended to ZLIB_VERSION. Version numbers
x.x.x.f are reserved for modifications to zlib by others than the zlib
maintainers. For example, if the version of the base zlib you are altering
is 1.2.3.4, then in zlib.h you should change ZLIB_VERNUM to 0x123f, and
ZLIB_VERSION to something like 1.2.3.f-zachary-mods-v3. You can also update
the version strings in deflate.c and inftrees.c."
But U-Boot is not exact version that's why following the same style which
has been used by Linux kernel where ZLIB_VERSION is completely removed.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
|
|
After some header file cleanups to add missing include files, remove
common.h from all files in the lib directory. This primarily means just
dropping the line but in a few cases we need to add in other header
files now.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
At this point, the remaining places where we have a symbol that is
defined as CONFIG_... are in fairly odd locations. While as much dead
code has been removed as possible, some of these locations are simply
less obvious at first. In other cases, this code is used, but was
defined in such a way as to have been missed by earlier checks. Perform
a rename of all such remaining symbols to be CFG_... rather than
CONFIG_...
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
As part of the effort to remove things from common.h, create a new header
for the gzip functions. Move the function declarations to it and add
missing documentation.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
At present malloc.h is included everywhere since it recently was added to
common.h in this commit:
4519668 mtd/nand/ubi: assortment of alignment fixes
This seems wasteful and unnecessary. We have been trying to trim down
common.h and put separate functions into separate header files and that
change goes in the opposite direction.
Move malloc_cache_aligned() to a new header so that this can be avoided.
The header would perhaps be better named as alignmem.h but it needs to be
included after common.h and people might be confused by this. With the name
memalign.h it fits nicely after malloc() in most cases.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
|
|
Various U-Boot adoptions/extensions to MTD/NAND/UBI did not take buffer
alignment into account which led to failures of the following form:
ERROR: v7_dcache_inval_range - start address is not aligned - 0x1f7f0108
ERROR: v7_dcache_inval_range - stop address is not aligned - 0x1f7f1108
Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
[trini: Add __UBOOT__ hunk to lib/zlib/zutil.c due to malloc.h in common.h]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
[trini: Fixup common/cmd_io.c]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen <leiwen@marvell.com>
|
