| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
It is confusing to have both "$(PHASE_)" and "$(XPL_)" be used in our
Makefiles as part of the macros to determine when to do something in our
Makefiles based on what phase of the build we are in. For consistency,
bring this down to a single macro and use "$(PHASE_)" only.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> says:
The current method of running unit tests relies on subcommands of the
ut command. Only the code in each subcommand knows how to find the tests
related to that subcomand.
This is not ideal and we now have quite a few subcommands which do
nothing but locate the relevant tests in a linker list, then call a
common function to run them.
This series adds a list of test suites, so that these subcommands can be
removed.
An issue with 'ut all' is that it doesn't record how many tests failed
overall, so it is necessary to examine copious amounts of output to look
for failures. This series adds a new 'total' feature allow recording the
total number of failed tests.
To help with 'ut all' a new pytest is created which runs it (as well as
'ut info') and makes sure that all is well. Due to the 'ut all' failures
this does not pass, so the test is disabled for now. It is here because
it provides security against misnaming a test suite and causing it not
to run.
Future work may:
- get 'ut all' passing
- enable test_suite() in CL, to ensure that 'ut all' keeps passing
- record duration of each suite
- allow running the tests in random order to tease out dependencies
- tweak the output to remove common prefixes
- getting rid of bootstd, optee and seame 'ut' subcommands
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250120212613.516664-1-sjg@chromium.org
|
|
Use the new suite-runner to run these tests instead.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
We want to encourage people to use an allocated bloblist since it is
more flexible than a fixed one. Make this the default, being sure not to
change existing users.
The unit tests require BLOBLIST_FIXED so add a dependency in the
Makefile to avoid build errors.
All sandbox builds require BLOBLIST_FIXED so make that the default for
sandbox.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
This test doesn't belong at the top level. Move it into the common/
directory, to match its implementation. Rename it to drop the
unnecessary _ut suffix.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> # rpi_3, rpi_4, rpi_arm64, am64x_evm_a53, am64-sk
|
|
This test doesn't belong at the top level. Move it into the common/
directory, to match its implementation.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> # rpi_3, rpi_4, rpi_arm64, am64x_evm_a53, am64-sk
|
|
The test_event_base and test_event_probe unit tests use function
event_register() which depends on CONFIG_EVENT_DYNAMIC=y.
Fixes: 7d02645fe4c0 ("event: Add a simple test")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
This function does not behave as expected when unknown escape sequences
are sent to it:
- it fails to store (and thus echo) the last character of the invalid
sequence
- it fails to set esc_len to 0 when it finishes emitting the invalid
sequence, meaning that the following character will appear to be part
of a new escape sequence
- it processes the first character of the rejected sequence as a valid
character, just starting the sequence all over again
The last two bugs conspire to produce an "impossible condition #876"
message which is the main symptom of this behaviour.
Fix these bugs and add a test to verify the behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
|
Add a test for cyclic function registration and activation.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Add a test for event registration and activation.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
This adds tests for the crypt-based and plain SHA256-based password hashing
algorithms in the autoboot flow.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Jaeckel <jaeckel-floss@eyet-services.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
