| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When abuf was introduced some test code was prevented from running using
a 'return 0' early in the functions. A comment said it crashed on
sandbox due to a 'bug' in realloc. Some time later a bug in abuf_realloc
was fixed but this test code was never enabled.
Remove the early 'return 0' instances so that the test code can run.
Also remove some checks that relied on the implementation details of the
U-Boot memory code as these can fail on sandbox which uses system memory
code. Besides that this code should be testing abuf implementation not
the underlying memory code which has its own tests.
Finally use a new #define for the allocs that are meant to fail to
ensure they do fail on all CI platforms.
This issue found by Smatch.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Goodbody <andrew.goodbody@linaro.org>
|
|
Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com> says:
To implement the EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_POINTER we need 4 MiB aligned
memory.
On the sandbox LMB uses addresses relative to the start of a page aligned
RAM buffer allocated with mmap(). This leads to a mismatch of alignment
between EFI which uses pointers and LMB which uses phys_addr_t.
Ensure that the RAM buffer used for LMB is 4 MiB aligned.
Provide a unit test for efi_alloc_aligned_pages() verifying this alignment.
Do not overwrite RAM size in dram_init().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250608075428.32631-1-heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com
|
|
Provide unit tests for efi_alloc_aligned_pages() and
efi_allocate_pages().
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
There is no need to have two separate API's for freeing up memory. Use
a single API lmb_free() to achieve this.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
There currently are two API's for requesting memory from the LMB
module, lmb_alloc() and lmb_alloc_base(). The function which does the
actual allocation is the same. Use the earlier introduced API
lmb_alloc_mem() for both types of allocation requests.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
There currently are multiple allocation API's in the LMB module. There
are a couple of API's for allocating memory(lmb_alloc() and
lmb_alloc_base()), and then there are two for requesting a reservation
for a particular memory region (lmb_reserve() and
lmb_alloc_addr()). Introduce a single API lmb_alloc_mem() which will
cater to all types of allocation requests and replace lmb_reserve()
and lmb_alloc_addr() with the new API.
Moreover, the lmb_reserve() API is pretty similar to the
lmb_alloc_addr() API, with the one difference being that the
lmb_reserve() API allows for reserving any address passed to it --
the address need not be part of the LMB memory map. The
lmb_alloc_addr() does check that the address being requested is
actually part of the LMB memory map.
There is no need to support reserving memory regions which are outside
the LMB memory map. Remove the lmb_reserve() API functionality and use
the functionality provided by lmb_alloc_addr() instead. The
lmb_alloc_addr() will check if the requested address is part of the
LMB memory map and return an error if not.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
It is useful to format a string into a buffer, with the sizing handled
automatically. Add a function for this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
It is useful to be able to copy an abuf, to allow changes while
preserving the original. Add a function for this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
This construct appears in various places. Reduce code size by adding a
function for it.
It inits the abuf, then allocates it to the requested size.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@prevas.dk> says:
This started as a rather simple patch, 1/12, adding the ability to
more conveniently do regex matching in shell.
But with that, it became very easy to see what the slre library can
and especially what it cannot do, and that way I found both outright
bugs and a "wow, doesn't it support that syntax" gotcha. I couldn't
find any tests ('git grep slre -- test/' was empty), so I added a
small test suite and tweaked slre.c.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250513084034.654865-1-ravi@prevas.dk
|
|
Inspecting the slre.c code reveals a few bugs; those are easy to
demonstrate with the new '=~' test operator. Before fixing them, let's
add a place to add test cases.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@prevas.dk>
|
|
The first of these, { "U-Boot", "^[B-Uo-t]*$", 0 }, would match
previously when the - and the letters were all interpreted literally.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@prevas.dk>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@prevas.dk>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@prevas.dk>
|
|
Add some tests for the "drop wrong anchored optimization". Without
the previous commit, the first, fifth and seventh of these would fail,
i.e. those:
{ "xby", "^a|b", 1},
{ "", "x*$", 1},
{ "yy", "x*$", 1},
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@prevas.dk>
|
|
Prepare v2025.07-rc3
|
|
These functions are useful for the EFI app. As a first step towards
making these available outside lib/efi_loader, create a separate header
file and include it where needed. Add proper comments to the functions,
since many are missing at present.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
|
This function trims whitespace from the start and end of a string. Add a
test for it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Add a test for uthread mutexes.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org>
|
|
Add a thread framework test to the lib tests. Update the API
documentation to use the test as an example.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
Test the initjmp() function when HAVE_INITJMP is set. Use the test as an
example in the API documentation.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> says:
This series switches to always using $(PHASE_) in Makefiles when
building rather than $(PHASE_) or $(XPL_). It also starts on documenting
this part of the build, but as a follow-up we need to rename
doc/develop/spl.rst and expand on explaining things a bit.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250401225851.1125678-1-trini@konsulko.com
|
|
It is confusing to have both "$(PHASE_)" and "$(XPL_)" be used in our
Makefiles as part of the macros to determine when to do something in our
Makefiles based on what phase of the build we are in. For consistency,
bring this down to a single macro and use "$(PHASE_)" only.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
empty/full"
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> says:
The membuff implementation curently has no tests. It also assumes that
head and tail can never correspond unless the buffer is empty.
This series provides a compile-time flag to support a 'full' flag. It
also adds some tests of the main routines.
The data structure is also renamed to membuf which fits better with
U-Boot.
There may be some cases in the code which could be optimised a little,
but the implementation is functional.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318152059.1464369-1-sjg@chromium.org
|
|
Add tests for the membuf implementation.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Commit 56f186a68b3 ("lmb: check if a region can be reserved by
lmb_reserve()") fixed the lmb_reserve() and lmb_alloc_addr() API's for
some corner case scenarios, and also added corresonding test cases for
these corner cases. These tests were checking, among other things, the
lmb_alloc_addr() API. The above commit was applied to the next branch.
Subsequently, there was commit 67be24906fe
("lmb: change the return code on lmb_alloc_addr()") which was first
applied on the master branch, and subsequently got merged to next as
part of the rebase. The second commit changes the return value of the
lmb_alloc_addr() API, which now results in some of the tests added as
part of the first commit to fail. Fix those test cases.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
|
|
Prepare v2025.04-rc5
|
|
Ben reports a failure to boot the kernel on hardware that starts its
physical memory from 0x0.
The reason is that lmb_alloc_addr(), which is supposed to reserve a
specific address, takes the address as the first argument, but then also
returns the address for success or failure and treats 0 as a failure.
Since we already know the address change the prototype to return an int.
Reported-by: Ben Schneider <ben@bens.haus>
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Ben Schneider <ben@bens.haus>
Reviewed-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
|
|
Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org> says:
The patch series contains some fixes and improvements in the lmb
code, along with addition of corresponding test cases for the changes
made.
The lmb_reserve() function currently does not check if the requested
reservation would overlap with existing reserved regions. While some
scenarios are being handled, some corner cases still exist. These are
being handled by patch 1, along with adding test cases for these
scenarios.
Patch 2 is handling the case of reserving a new region of memory, but
that region overlaps with an existing region. The current code only
handles one particular scenario, but prints a message for the other
scenario of an encompassing overlap and returns back. The patch
handles the encompassing overlap.
Patch 3 is an improvement whereby we allow coalescing a newly reserved
region with an existing region. The current code exits this check
prematurely.
Patch 4 is removing a now superfluous check for overlapping regions
with flag other than LMB_NONE. This now gets handled at an earlier
point in lmb_reserve().
Patch 5 is clubbing the functionality to check if two regions are
adjacent, or overlap, allowing some code re-use.
Patch 6 is optimising the lmb_alloc() function by having it call
_lmb_alloc_base() directly.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250303133231.405279-1-sughosh.ganu@linaro.org
|
|
The logic used in lmb_alloc() takes into consideration the existing
reserved regions, and ensures that the allocated region does not
overlap with any existing allocated regions. The lmb_reserve()
function is not doing any such checks -- the requested region might
overlap with an existing region. This also shows up with
lmb_alloc_addr() as this function ends up calling lmb_reserve().
Add a function which checks if the region requested is overlapping
with an existing reserved region, and allow for the reservation to
happen only if both the regions have LMB_NONE flag, which allows
re-requesting of the region. In any other scenario of an overlap, have
lmb_reserve() return -EEXIST, implying that the requested region is
already reserved.
Add corresponding test cases which check for overlapping reservation
requests made through lmb_reserve() and lmb_alloc_addr(). And while
here, fix some of the comments in the test function being touched.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
|
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-tegra into next
|
|
Separate setjmp.h into an architecture independent part and an architecture
specific part. This simplifies moving from using struct jmp_buf_data
directly to using type jmp_buf in our code which is the C compliant way.
Reviewed-by: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
|
The existing memory layout places the bloblist at 0xb000 and the fdt at
0x100, resulting in a 0xaf00 size constraint for the fdt. This constraint
has been reached. Lets modify the layout by moving the bloblist to 0x100,
device tree to 0x1000 and placing early memory allocation after pre-console
buffer at 0xf4000. This should guarantee sufficient memory allocation for
future expansion.
Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
|
|
Add unit tests for the library functions.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
[jf: drop unwanted change to lib/string.c]
Signed-off-by: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org>
|
|
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> says:
The current method of running unit tests relies on subcommands of the
ut command. Only the code in each subcommand knows how to find the tests
related to that subcomand.
This is not ideal and we now have quite a few subcommands which do
nothing but locate the relevant tests in a linker list, then call a
common function to run them.
This series adds a list of test suites, so that these subcommands can be
removed.
An issue with 'ut all' is that it doesn't record how many tests failed
overall, so it is necessary to examine copious amounts of output to look
for failures. This series adds a new 'total' feature allow recording the
total number of failed tests.
To help with 'ut all' a new pytest is created which runs it (as well as
'ut info') and makes sure that all is well. Due to the 'ut all' failures
this does not pass, so the test is disabled for now. It is here because
it provides security against misnaming a test suite and causing it not
to run.
Future work may:
- get 'ut all' passing
- enable test_suite() in CL, to ensure that 'ut all' keeps passing
- record duration of each suite
- allow running the tests in random order to tease out dependencies
- tweak the output to remove common prefixes
- getting rid of bootstd, optee and seame 'ut' subcommands
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250120212613.516664-1-sjg@chromium.org
|
|
Use the new suite-runner to run these tests instead.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Most test suites have a _test suffix. This is not necessary as there is
also a ut_ prefix.
Drop the suffix so that (with future work) the suite name can be used as
the linker-list name.
Remove the suffix from the pytest regex as well, moving it to the top of
the file, as it is a constant.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
The string conversion functions are implemented in lib/strto.c which is
only compiled if CONFIG_STRTO=y.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
|
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> says:
The current UPL spec[1] has been tidied up and improved over the last
year, since U-Boot's original UPL support was written.
This series includes some prerequisite patches needed for the real UPL
patches. It is split from [2]
[1] https://github.com/UniversalPayload/spec/tree/3f1450d
[2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=438574&state=*
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250111000029.245022-1-sjg@chromium.org
|
|
Add a new initialiser which can accept a constant pointer.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
In many cases it is useful to get the address of a buffer, e.g. when
booting from it. Add a function to handle this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Philippe Reynes <philippe.reynes@softathome.com> says:
This serie adds the support of sha256_hmac and sha256_hkdf.
A first version was sent several months ago just before the
integration of mbedtls. This new version is based on mbedtls.
The first patch of this serie add the support of hkdf
using mbedtls.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241219130554.49825-1-philippe.reynes@softathome.com
|
|
Adds a test for the function sha256_hkdf.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Reynes <philippe.reynes@softathome.com>
Reviewed-by: Raymond Mao <raymond.mao@linaro.org>
|
|
Adds a test for the function sha256_hmac
Signed-off-by: Philippe Reynes <philippe.reynes@softathome.com>
Reviewed-by: Raymond Mao <raymond.mao@linaro.org>
|
|
Andrew Goodbody <andrew.goodbody@linaro.org> says:
Picking up a series from Dan Carpenter and applying requested
changes for v2.
I had previously set CONFIG_64BIT for arm64. This patchset does the
same thing for sandbox and x86_64. (Mips and riscv were already
doing it). This CONFIG option is used in the Makefile to determine
if it's a 32 or 64 bit system for the CHECKER.
Makefile
1052 # the checker needs the correct machine size
1053 CHECKFLAGS += $(if $(CONFIG_64BIT),-m64,-m32)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241216180736.1933807-1-andrew.goodbody@linaro.org
|
|
Should use CONFIG_64BIT to detect a 64 bit compile and not
CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT. This allows more platforms to run the
full test code.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Goodbody <andrew.goodbody@linaro.org>
|
|
lmb_alloc_base() is just calling lmb_alloc_base_flags() with LMB_NONE.
There's not much we gain from this abstraction, so let's remove the
former add the flags argument to lmb_alloc_base() and make the code
a bit easier to follow.
Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
lmb_alloc_addr() is just calling lmb_alloc_addr_flags() with LMB_NONE
There's not much we gain from this abstraction, so let's remove the
latter, add a flags argument to lmb_alloc_addr() and make the code a
bit easier to follow.
Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
free_mem is a misnomer. We never update it with the free memory for
LMB. Instead, it describes all available memory and is checked against
used_mem to decide whether an area is free or not.
So let's rename this field to better match its usage.
Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
|
lmb_reserve() is just calling lmb_reserve_flags() with LMB_NONE.
There's not much we gain from this abstraction.
So let's remove the latter, add the flags argument to lmb_reserve()
and make the code a bit easier to follow.
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
|
