| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Expand dm_test_ofnode_phandle(_ot) with new ofnode/tree_parse_phandle() op.
Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Fix broken dm_test_ofnode_phandle_ot test. They never actually worked
and were passing test by pure luck by having the same phandle index of
test.dts that coincicentally had #gpio-cells in the same index node.
It was sufficient to add a phandle to test.dts to make the test fail.
To correctly test these feature, make use oif the new OPs oftree to
parse phandle.
For consistency with the dm_test_ofnode_phandle, rework the test and
other.dts to use the same property with the other- prefix to every
node.
Also fix dm_test_ofnode_get_by_phandle_ot by making it more robust and
renaming the phandle property to other-phandle.
Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
We need an 'other' FDT which is different from the control FDT, so we can
check that the ofnode tests correctly handle them both.
Add this to the build along with a way to read it into the sandbox state.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
