| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The early malloc region is normally quite small and is certainly less
than 4GB, so use a 32-bit value for the limit and pointer. Update the
comments for clarity while we are here.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
As part of bringing the master branch back in to next, we need to allow
for all of these changes to exist here.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes
<asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already
and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove
<asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd"
an so have <asm/global_data.h> already.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and
when needed add missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the
malloc pool exists.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
|
The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do
not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come
from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in
to CFG namespace.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move
related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
|
- Merge the patch to take <asm/global_data.h> out of <common.h>
|
|
There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that
could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to
use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers.
We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be
64-bit on a 32-bit platform.
Rename these 2 functions to be clearer:
bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l()
print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll()
While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can
be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
|
Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In
a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding
another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header
files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few
cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so
remove that include.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create
a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that.
Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
